IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/amz/wpaper/2021-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Productivity Commission: A Proposal for an Australian-style approach to creating a Policy-Reform Process for the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Vines, David

Abstract

The UK now faces many fundamental political-economy choices. These cover: dealing with the implications of Covid for healthcare and social care; making post-Brexit decisions about trade policy and industrial policy; achieving net-zero carbon emissions; responding to the North-South divide and dealing with inequality; rethinking the UK's policy for primary, secondary and tertiary education; and constructing a policy to shape the country's research and development agenda. All of these choices have implications for how the UK's low level of productivity might be raised. This paper argues that there is a need for a national policy review institution – a Productivity Commission - to provide guidance for these choices. This would be a statutory body, one that could both analyse reforms and make policy recommendations to Government, according to their implications both for the UK's national interest, and for different groups within the country. A valuable model is provided by Australia's Productivity Commission, an institution with a long history of making recommendations on a wide range of microeconomic and social-policy issues. I spell out how this institution came to be established, why it has been so important in Australia, and what we can learn from this Australian experience. I examine what the policy guidelines for such an instiution might be and show how such a body might be established in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Vines, David, 2021. "A Productivity Commission: A Proposal for an Australian-style approach to creating a Policy-Reform Process for the UK," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-13, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2021-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://oms-inet.files.svdcdn.com/production/files/productivity_commission_UK_3_p.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. M. Corden, 1958. "Import Restrictions And Triffs:A New Look At Australian Policy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 34(69), pages 331-346, December.
    2. W. M. Corden, 1985. "Tell us Where the New Jobs will Come from," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 183-188, June.
    3. W. M. Corden & P. B. Dixon, 1980. "A Tax‐Wage Bargain in Australia:Is a Free Lunch Possible?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 56(154), pages 209-221, September.
    4. repec:bla:ecorec:v:56:y:1980:i:154:p:209-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. John Williamson, 1994. "The Political Economy of Policy Reform," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 68, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan Caplan & Edward Stringham, 2005. "Mises, bastiat, public opinion, and public choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 79-105.
    2. Guillermo A. Calvo, 2008. "Crises in Emerging Markets Economies: A Global Perspective," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Kevin Cowan & Sebastián Edwards & Rodrigo O. Valdés & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt- (ed.),Current Account and External Financing, edition 1, volume 12, chapter 3, pages 085-115, Central Bank of Chile.
    3. Wallis, Joe & Dollery, Brian, 2001. "Government Failure, Social Capital and the Appropriateness of the New Zealand Model for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 245-263, February.
    4. Evan Jones, 2016. "Australian Trade Liberalisation Policy: The Industries Assistance Commission and the Productivity Commission," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(2), pages 181-198, June.
    5. Subhani, Muhammad Imtiaz & Osman, Ms. Amber & Lakhiya, Zubair, 2011. "The Structure and Performance of Economy of Pakistan (Comparative Study between Democratic and Non-Democratic Governments)," MPRA Paper 34732, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    6. Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "The Economics And Politics Of Uniform Tariffs," International Trade 0309009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jacky AMPROU & Elsa DURET, 1999. "Réformes, groupes d'intérêt et dépendance à l'aide : théorie et estimation économétrique," Working Papers 199907, CERDI.
    8. Pitlik, Hans & Wirth, Steffen, 2003. "Do crises promote the extent of economic liberalization?: an empirical test," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 565-581, September.
    9. Nigel Harris, 1997. "Cities in a Global Economy: Structural Change and Policy Reactions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    10. Nunnenkamp, Peter, 1995. "Wirtschaftsreformen in Entwicklungs- und Transformationsländern: Anreizprobleme, Glaubwürdigkeitsdefizite und die Erfolgschancen umfassender Reformen," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1636, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. repec:idb:brikps:377 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Bernd Hayo & Doh Shin, 2002. "Popular Reaction to the Intervention by the IMF in the Korean Economic Crisis," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 89-100.
    13. Prato, Carlo & Wolton, Stephane, 2018. "Rational ignorance, populism, and reform," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 119-135.
    14. Cossu Elena, 2023. "Clustering and Analysing Relevant Policy Dimensions of Populist, Left-Wing, Centrist, and Right-Wing Parties across Europe," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 41-54, June.
    15. Andrea Bastianin & Paolo Castelnovo & Massimo Florio, 2017. "The Empirics of Regulatory Reforms Proxied by Categorical Variables: Recent Findings and Methodological Issues," ETA: Economic Theory and Applications 257877, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Saka, Orkun & Campos, Nauro F. & De Grauwe, Paul & Ji, Yuemei & Martelli, Angelo, 2019. "Financial Crises and Liberalization: Progress or Reversals?," IZA Discussion Papers 12393, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Bruno S. Frey, 2000. "Was Bewirkt die Volkswirtschaftslehre?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 1(1), pages 5-33, February.
    18. Wallis, Joe, 1999. "Understanding the role of leadership in economic policy reform," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 39-53, January.
    19. McCourt, Willy, 2003. "Political Commitment to Reform: Civil Service Reform in Swaziland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1015-1031, June.
    20. Hayo, Bernd, 1999. "Micro and macro determinants of public support for market reforms in Eastern Europe," ZEI Working Papers B 25-1999, University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies.
    21. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2003. "Pluralism in Economics: A Public Good or a Public Bad?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-034/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 18 May 2004.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2021-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INET Oxford admin team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inoxfuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.