IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/amu/wpaper/2013-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Local Government Performance in Rural Poland: What Matters?

Author

Listed:
  • Mieke Meurs
  • Renata Kochut

Abstract

The 1990s saw widespread decentralization of government in the former socialist countries of East-Central Europe and Eurasia. The reforms shared a goal of improving government performance by increasing accountability, bringing decisions more in line with the preferences of populations, and exploiting locally available information in decision-making. However, outcomes have varied significantly, even within countries, among local governments operating in a uniform institutional framework. In this paper, we combine publically-available municipal-level data with data from a unique 2005 survey of municipalities to examine and explain variations in the performance of rural local governments in Poland over the periods 2003-2005 and 2006-2008. Rural governments face particular obstacles to good performance including, in some places, lower resource bases, fewer people of working age, and less-developed infrastructure. Drawing on a growing theoretical and empirical literature on local government performance in developing and former socialist economies, we analyze the role of local government characteristics (skill and accountability), European Union support, and inherited factors (economic development and orientation, location) in three measures of performance, using a simple, OLS framework, a set of representative cases, and a mapping of high- and low-performing gminas. We find that decentralization outcomes vary significantly across municipalities and that the factors associated with success are not consistent across measures or over time. Still, some variables measuring local government skill, mayoral networking, and electoral accountability have an impact on some measures of performance. These findings echo pervious work in both developing and post-socialist countries. An additional important finding is that factors outside the control of local governments, including location, infrastructure, and historical levels and types of economic activity are strongly related to outcomes but, again, the significant variables differ across outcome measures. In the 2006-2008 period, EU transfers per citizen have a consistent positive impact on own per capita revenue outcomes of municipalities, but not on other outcomes, and result in only small changes in the impact of other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Mieke Meurs & Renata Kochut, "undated". "Local Government Performance in Rural Poland: What Matters?," Working Papers 2013-09, American University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:amu:wpaper:2013-09
    DOI: 10.17606/y03f-ct78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17606/y03f-ct78
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17606/y03f-ct78?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Hasan Mahmut KALKIÞIM, 2016. "Social Municipality Perception in Turkey: A Case Study in the Istanbul, Izmir, Adana, Diyarbakýr Metropolitan Municipalities," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 216-224, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    local government; Poland; rural;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • P35 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amu:wpaper:2013-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Meal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.american.edu/cas/economics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.