IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/alo/isipdp/02-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cricket interruptus: Fairness and incentive in interruped cricket matches

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Carter

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Graeme Guthrie

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

Abstract

We present a new adjustment rule for interrupted cricket matches that equalizes the probability of winning before and after the interruption. Our proposal differs from existing rules in the quantity preserved (the probability of winning), and also in the point at which it is measured (the time of interruption). We claim this is both fair and free of incentive effects. We give several examples of how our rule could have been applied in past matches, including some in which the ultimate result might have been different.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Carter & Graeme Guthrie, 2002. "Cricket interruptus: Fairness and incentive in interruped cricket matches," Discussion Papers 02-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    • Handle: RePEc:alo:isipdp:02-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.isid.ac.in/~pu/dispapers/dp02-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Romer, 2002. "It's Fourth Down and What Does the Bellman Equation Say? A Dynamic Programming Analysis of Football Strategy," NBER Working Papers 9024, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Zitzewitz, 2006. "Nationalism in Winter Sports Judging and Its Lessons for Organizational Decision Making," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 67-99, March.
    2. Bhaskar, V, 2004. "Rational Adversaries? Evidence from Randomized Trials in the Game of Cricket," Economics Discussion Papers 8875, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    3. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Craig Fernandes & Martin L. Puterman, 2021. "Points Gained in Football: Using Markov Process-Based Value Functions to Assess Team Performance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 877-894, May.
    4. Alamar Benjamin C, 2010. "Measuring Risk in NFL Playcalling," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-9, April.
    5. Ryan Elmore & Andrew Urbaczewski, 2021. "Loss Aversion in Professional Golf," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 22(2), pages 202-217, February.
    6. James M. Poterba, 2005. "Steven D. Levitt: 2003 John Bates Clark Medalist," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 181-198, Summer.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alo:isipdp:02-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Debasis Mishra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isindin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.