IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkpbs/037.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Klimaskepsis und Ausreden: Wie beurteilen die Deutschen den Klimawandel und die Notwendigkeit, etwas dagegen zu tun?

Author

Listed:
  • Armin Falk

    (University of Bonn, briq Institute)

  • Mark Fallak

    (Institute of Labor Economics)

  • Lasse Stötzer

    (briq Institute)

Abstract

Jeder Fünfte bezweifelt den wissenschaftlichen Konsens zum menschengemachten Klimawandel. Die große Mehrheit der Deutschen ist davon überzeugt, dass es den Klimawandel gibt und dass er menschengemacht ist, 22 Prozent der Befragten äußern jedoch klimaskeptische Einschätzungen. Gründe könnten Wissenschaftsskepsis und die weitverbreitete Fehleinschätzung sein, es gebe in Fragen des Klimawandels keinen wissenschaftlichen Konsens. Die meisten Argumente gegen zusätzlichen Klimaschutz finden bei einer großen Mehrheit der Deutschen keine Unterstützung.

Suggested Citation

  • Armin Falk & Mark Fallak & Lasse Stötzer, 2022. "Klimaskepsis und Ausreden: Wie beurteilen die Deutschen den Klimawandel und die Notwendigkeit, etwas dagegen zu tun?," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 037, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkpbs/ECONtribute_PB_037_2022.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.