IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwapdp/232290.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamically Optimal Adoption of Farming Practices Which Degrade or Renew the Land

Author

Listed:
  • Hertzler, G.L.

Abstract

Many farming decisions are choices among discrete practices. This is particularly true for decisions that degrade or renew the land over time. Most models of soil erosion, acidity, or salinity, however, try to approximate discrete choices by a static model or by a dynamic model with continuous control. This study constructs a dynamic model for the optimal adoption of discrete practices. The model is an extension of free-time optimal control. Each discrete practice has its own optimal control problem and these control problems are linked over time to study optimal switching among practices. Land is often considered an exhaustible resource, but several practices renew rather than degrade the land. It is found that an optimal time path typically has an initial phase of degradation followed by a steady-state rotation between degrading and renewing practices. The initial phase could be one of renewal and the final phase one of abandoning or selling the land. The renewal of soil acidity, salinity and, perhaps, erosion makes agriculture sustainable into the indefinite future and shifts the focus of public policy from conserving an exhaustible land resource to attaining the optimal steadystate. It also shown that a discrete but static model or a dynamic but continuous model has no optimality properties whatever. This is unfortunate because the dynamic discrete-choice model is more difficult to solve. A few special cases may be easily solved but the general model requires large-scale mathematical programming with special gradient calculations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hertzler, G.L., 1990. "Dynamically Optimal Adoption of Farming Practices Which Degrade or Renew the Land," Discussion Papers 232290, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwapdp:232290
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232290/files/uwa-discussionpapers-005-090.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hertzler, Greg, 1994. "Coordinating Production And Disposal Of Commodity Stockpiles With Application To Australia'S Wool Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Miao, Ruiqing & Hennessy, David A. & FENG, HONGLI, 2013. "Native Grassland Conversion: the Roles of Risk Intervention and Switching Costs," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149865, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Milham, Nick, 1993. "Towards Ecological Reality in Economic Models," 1993 Conference (37th), February 9-11, 1993, Sydney, Australia 147742, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Ruiqing Miao & David A. Hennessy & Hongli Feng, 2014. "Sodbusting, Crop Insurance, and Sunk Conversion Costs," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(4), pages 601-622.
    5. Mueller, Ute & Schilizzi, Steven & Tran, Tuyet, 1999. "The dynamics of phase farming in dryland salinity abatement," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(1), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwapdp:232290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aruwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.