Author
Listed:
- Muhammad, Andrew
- Menard, R. Jamey
- Hughes, David W.
- Clark, Harrison
- Taylor, Adam
Abstract
The U.S. is the world’s largest source of industrial wood production (FAO, 2019), with the U.S. South accounting for half of total production (Howard and Liang, 2019). Most of this production is from the “pine belt,” which includes states like Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia. Unlike these pine-belt states, Tennessee is primarily a hardwood state (deciduous trees), which are rela- tively high value and make an important contribution to Tennessee’s economy (Pelkki and Sherman, 2020). Tennessee’s forestry activity tends to be in rural areas and is often smaller scale than other industries, so the economic and social importance of the wood products industry are often underappreciated. It is estimated that forestry in Tennessee provides over 85,000 jobs and has an annual economic impact of over $21 billion (Menard, English and Jensen, 2021). Tennessee is among the top ten states in terms of the relative importance of forestry, alongside Maine, Wisconsin, and Oregon (Pelkki and Sherman, 2020). Tennessee’s forestry industry is globally connected, and many sawmills in the state are dependent on global sales. About half of the higher-grade hardwood lumber produced in Tennessee is exported (Luppold et al., 2018). Consequently, changes in global markets can have a significant impact on Tennessee’s forest economy. In this report, we discuss the economic impact of Tennessee’s forestry exports. We examine the export changes in 2022 (relative to 2021) across destination countries (e.g., China, European Union) and by product (e.g., oak lumber, hardwood logs, barrels), and further assess the full economic impact of export sales on income and jobs at the state level. Forestry exports are not just important to Tennessee but to the entire country. U.S. sales of forest products to foreign countries were $10.5 billion in 2022. In the context of agriculture and related products (as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture),1 forest products are an important share of total U.S. exports, with global sales comparable to America’s top agricultural exports: beef ($11.8 billion), dairy products ($9.5 billion), cotton ($8.9 billion), and wheat ($8.3 billion). Forestry exports in Tennessee ($194 million in 2022) ranked third among agricultural and related exports behind distilled spirits and cotton (USDA, 2023). Exports of forest products were negatively impacted by the U.S. trade war with China in 2018 and 2019 and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This was the case for both the U.S. and Tennessee. The pandemic had a significant impact on global sales due to supply and demand disruptions in the global market for finished wood products (e.g., furniture) and the interrelated market for raw materials and inputs (e.g., logs and lumber) (Muhammad and Taylor, 2020). These effects were in addition to the negative impacts of China’s retaliatory tariffs on U.S. timber, which are still in place (Muhammad et al., 2022). Exports of forest products from 2019 to 2022, nationally, regionally, and for Tennessee are reported in Table 1. From 2020 to 2021, U.S. exports increased by $2.1 billion. In 2022, exports continued to increase by $756 million (nearly 8%) when compared to the previous year, reaching 10.5 billion. This increase was mostly in Southern states, followed by Western states. U.S. and Tennessee exports further recovered in 2022 by 8% and 4%, respectively, when compared to 2021 (USDA, 2023). The increase in exports sales in 2021 and 2022 was a welcomed turnaround given the declines experienced in previous years.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad, Andrew & Menard, R. Jamey & Hughes, David W. & Clark, Harrison & Taylor, Adam, 2023.
"Economic Impact of Tennessee Forest Product Exports in 2022,"
Extension Reports
339038, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:utaeer:339038
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339038
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:339038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.