Author
Listed:
- Griffith, Andrew P.
- Martinez, Charles
Abstract
Coronavirus (COVID-19) has had far-reaching impacts on the cattle market. The most publicized impacts have been related to the backlog of finished cattle associated with reduced slaughter rates, which resulted in lower finished cattle prices. Additionally, the reduced finished cattle slaughter resulted in lower feeder cattle prices and delayed marketing of feeder cattle and calves by many cattle producers. However, finished cattle and feeder cattle are not the only markets that influence returns for Tennessee cattle producers. Another major income source for many Tennessee cattle producers comes in the form of slaughter cows. As cows mature and become less reproductively efficient, producers will cull them out of the herd and sell them as slaughter cows. Slaughter cow sales make up 15 to 20 percent of the gross income on most cow-calf operations (Durst et al., 2017). The relatively large percentage of gross income from slaughter cows points to the importance of this market to cow-calf operations. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the impact COVID-19 had on the slaughter cow market and its implications for cow-calf producers in Tennessee. The slaughter cow market is driven by supply and demand for ground beef. There are three primary sources of beef that help fulfill ground beef demand, including trimmings from finished cattle, lean beef imports and slaughter cows. In addition to the three listed sources of ground beef, there are times when whole muscle cuts (i.e., chucks, rounds) from finished cattle are ground to fulfill ground beef demand. The purpose of this publication is to illustrate how slaughter cow prices in Tennessee have been influenced by COVID-19. This will be accomplished by evaluating mature cow slaughter and slaughter cow prices in Tennessee during the first five months of 2020, as compared to previous years.
Suggested Citation
Griffith, Andrew P. & Martinez, Charles, 2020.
"Tennessee Slaughter Cow Market During COVID-19,"
Extension Reports
304051, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:utaeer:304051
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.304051
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:304051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.