Author
Listed:
- Cui, Xiurui Iris
- Smith, S. Aaron
Abstract
In April 2020, University of Tennessee (UT) Extension conducted a survey of hemp growers and hemp industry stakeholders. The survey consisted of 16 questions to illicit opinions regarding 2019 and 2020 hemp production in Tennessee. The survey was emailed to UT county Extension agents, area specialists and state specialists to be distributed to producers and other hemp industry stakeholders. Survey results depict the answers and opinions of the 600 respondents who completed at least one survey question. The following information has been collected to show an overview of production, marketing and risk management practices used in the 2019 and 2020 production years. While readers can draw their own conclusions, our analysis of the results indicated that producers faced numerous challenges during the 2019 production year. Two of the largest challenges were securing a viable market or processor for their production and variation/uncertainty in pricing of the end product. On the positive side, in spite of a lack of established production methods, producers were able to successfully grow a crop, with average plant losses of only 19 percent and average yields per plant of 2.0 lb for biomass and 1.1 lb per plant for flower. Partially due to marketing challenges, the 2020 production level is anticipated to be lower than 2019. Additionally, due to bad experiences in 2019 with contracts, fewer growers are signing contracts with processors or purchasers. Despite the marketing challenges and a lack of regulatory clarity, many producers and stakeholders are willing to continue investing in the emerging hemp industry in Tennessee. The long-term structure and viability of the industrial hemp industry in Tennessee remains highly uncertain.
Suggested Citation
Cui, Xiurui Iris & Smith, S. Aaron, 2020.
"University of Tennessee Extension's 2020 Hemp Industry Survey,"
Extension Reports
304050, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:utaeer:304050
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.304050
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:304050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.