IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/utaeer/303684.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

To Cut or Not to Cut? Price Comparisons of Bulls and Steers in Tennessee

Author

Listed:
  • Martinez, Charles

Abstract

Most cattle producers market their calves through a local livestock auction facility. When marketing through a sale barn, many of the marketing aspects cannot be controlled or managed by the cattle producer. For instance, cattle producers do not control the volume of buyers or the quantity of cattle marketed that day. A producer can, however, control sale location, sale timing and at what weight they choose to sell calves. Another controllable factor that may influence price and profitability is the choice of a producer to sell male calves/feeder cattle as steers or as bull calves. If bull calves are not intended to be kept as herdsire prospects, a producer has the choice to castrate them or leave them as intact calves at the time of marketing. The decision to cut a male could be based upon age of the calf and/or the method that the producer chooses to utilize for castration. The decision leaves producers with a common question, “Does cutting calves increase revenue?” This publication aims to help producers answer that question.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinez, Charles, 2020. "To Cut or Not to Cut? Price Comparisons of Bulls and Steers in Tennessee," Extension Reports 303684, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303684
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303684/files/W901.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Griffith, Andrew P., 2023. "Heifer Price Discount to Steers in Tennessee Calves and Feeder Cattle," Extension Reports 330805, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:utaeer:303684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dautkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.