Author
Abstract
This note presents a framework for assessing social performance (social performance assessment - SPA), and how this information can be used to inform decisions that affect both the social and financial performance of the microfinance institutions - this we term social performance management, SPM. Impact assessment studies commissioned primarily to serve donor interests are often of little help to MFIs themselves. They tend to be too complex, time-consuming and costly. They do not generate information that is sufficiently timely, regular, reliable and cost-effective to aid MFIs' own social performance management. As a result, microfinance has made less progress towards institutionalization of social performance management than it has towards institutionalization of financial performance management. Improvement in the way MFIs routinely define their social goals and assess progress towards them are beneficial in two ways: 1) Greater transparency about their success in reaching and serving target markets will assist donors and investors in making good use of microfinance resources and in funding development programmes. 2) Social performance information helps MFIs to understand their clients' needs and to develop more appropriate and effective services. The development of simple, routine and self-directed methods of social performance assessment by MFIs themselves offers a way forward. By investing in this, donors can ensure both that the social return to microfinance improves and that it is seen to do so.
Suggested Citation
Unknown, 2004.
"Cost-Effective Social Performance Management : Meeting the Social and Financial Goals of Microfinance,"
Policy Notes
23757, University of Sussex, Imp-Act: Improving the Impact of Microfinance on Poverty: Action Research Program.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:usuxpn:23757
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usuxpn:23757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idsusuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.