IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uscfwp/232931.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Development of Catfish as a Farm Crop and an Estimation of Its Economic Adaptability to Radiation Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Morton M.
  • Nash, Darrel A.

Abstract

The catfish farming industry during the next few decades will face some crucial challenges. First, in order to adapt to the apparent increased production, well-organized efficient markets must be developed. The success of this industry during the next 10 years will primarily depend on the adequacy of this marketing strucutre. In addition, it will be necessary for the catfish industry to improve productivity and lower production costs to make catfish products competitive. These challenges notwithstanding, it is clear that the catfish industry will expand significantly during the next 15 to 20 years. The strucutre of the expanded catfish industry by that time will differ markedly from the current industry. Production techniques will be changed; the market will be more organized and progessive; and it is also likely that the fish will represent an improved genetic species, more adaptable to fish farming. At the present, pond reared catfish are marketed either live for fee pond fishing or as a fresh (unfrozen) product. Although the market for fresh catfish can be expanded, the analysis in this study shows clearly the need to develop new products to absorb the increased output of catfish. Radiation-pasteurization processing, it was found will undoubtedly pay substantial dividends in terms of direct public benefits. If the entire farm output were marketed in the fresh-irradiated form, then depending upon the discount rate, benefits would range between $31 and $45 million discounted value over an 11 year period. Likewise, the development of irradiation processed catfish products will increase net returns over and above all costs, including irradiation costs, to the industry. It would be expected that during the period 1975-1985, an irradiated product, selling in an unfrozen form, would generate 5 percent greater net revenue for the industry than would be generated by the sales of fresh catfish. This increase in net revenue will primarily be due to : (1) reduced spoilage loss (2) increased sales because of the elimination of the practice of short-buying, i.e., buying less than expected sales as a hedge against spoilage loss. Although there is little doubt that radiation processing can pay for itself in both the public and private sector, frozen catfish products represent a feasible alternative. If it were possible to market the same amount of catfish in the frozen form as in the fresh form, net revenues from irratdiated catfish. Marketing in the frozen form, in any case, adds less to the national income stream than irradiated. What is likely is that some combination of fresh and frozen catfish will make up the marketed forms. In this case, it is fully expected that irradiation-pasteurization will provide substantial public and private benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Morton M. & Nash, Darrel A., 1969. "The Development of Catfish as a Farm Crop and an Estimation of Its Economic Adaptability to Radiation Processing," Working Papers 232931, United States Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Division of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uscfwp:232931
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232931/files/us-fisheries-interior-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bell, Frederick W. & Carlson, Ernest W., 1970. "The Productivity of the Sea and Malthusian Scarcity," Working Papers 233061, United States Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Division of Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uscfwp:232931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.