IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unasrr/234927.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling NML Using the Area Frame Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, theodore
  • Kott, Phillip S.

Abstract

This report outlines the results of various experiments to model the probability of an area-frame farm not being on the census mailing list (NML) using covariates such as total sales, type of farm, acreage, various operator characteristics (gender, Hispanic status, race, and whether the primaryl occupation of the principal operator is farming), number (if any) of equine on the farm, and, optionally, Area-Frame-Survey stratum. Three sets of experiments were conducted. The ¯rst used California data only. The second used data from three states - Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa, while the third used data from the entire 48 contiguous states (there is no Area Frame Survey in either Alaska or Hawaii). The statistical methodology employed was logistic regression with a modi¯cation of stepwise regression for variable selection. Standard errors were estimated using design- based linearization methods. Conclusions are drawn about the nature of 2002 NML farms. Some are as expected (farms with small total sales are more likely to be NML). Others are surprising (holding all other factors constant, point farms are not sgni¯cantly more likely to be NML than other farms with less than $2,500 in annual sales). A number of methodological problems needing further research are suggested as a result of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, theodore & Kott, Phillip S., 2004. "Modeling NML Using the Area Frame Survey," NASS Research Reports 234927, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:234927
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234927/files/nml0826.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.234927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zaslavsky A. M. & Schenker N. & Belin T. R., 2001. "Downweighting Influential Clusters in Surveys: Application to the 1990 Post Enumeration Survey," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 858-869, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Unknown, 2007. "Improving Information About America's Farms and Ranches: A Review of the Census of Agriculture," C-FARE Review of the Census of Agriculture 37356, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barranco-Chamorro, I. & Jiménez-Gamero, M.D. & Moreno-Rebollo, J.L. & Muñoz-Pichardo, J.M., 2012. "Case-deletion type diagnostics for calibration estimators in survey sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2219-2236.
    2. Li Jianzhu & Valliant Richard, 2015. "Linear Regression Diagnostics in Cluster Samples," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(1), pages 61-75, March.
    3. repec:ags:unassr:234927 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Barranco-Chamorro, I. & Jiménez-Gamero, M.D. & Mayor-Gallego, J.A. & Moreno-Rebollo, J.L., 2015. "A case-deletion diagnostic for penalized calibration estimators and BLUP under linear mixed models in survey sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 18-33.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization; Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unasrr:234927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nass.usda.gov/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.