Author
Listed:
- Pa, Chung
- Turvey, Calum G.
- Meilke, Karl D.
Abstract
This paper developes a multiperiod model in which hedge adjustments are allowed. The two major marketing alternatives specified in the model are to sell in the spot market or to forward contract using formula pricing. To proxy the underlying forward contract value, the American put call parity (APCP) technique is used. The conceptual framework considers a mean-variance utility function that is maximized sequentially to obtain optimal forward contract and hedge ratios. The closed loop solution guides the dymanic flow of information between decision stages via three essential features: sequential dependence, feedback, and anticipated revision. The empirical model considers a multivariate ARMA-GARCH framework that estimates the time series of A{CP values, live hog prices, and future gains/losses simultaneously with the conditional (time-varying) variance-covariance structure. This provides a superior forecasting tool to capture the second-moment dynamics for computing optimal forward contract and hedge ratios. The simulation results recommend significant upward hedge adjustments on average. This reflects the time-varying pattern of optimal hedge ratios. The optimal forward contract ratios indicate in almost all instances that hogs should be marketed in entirely in advance. The effectiveness of CME live/lean hog futures hedging is assessed for its ability to reduce both spot price and contract value risks under under the closed loop solution. The percentage improvement in utility is compared with two other alternative portfolios of no hedgig and non-adjustable MGARCH hedging. The findings indicate that the closed loop solution is able to acheive the best utility outcome especially in volatile market situations
Suggested Citation
Pa, Chung & Turvey, Calum G. & Meilke, Karl D., 2002.
"Closed-Loop Solution For Optimal Sequential Hedging And Forward Contracting In U.S. Hog Production,"
Working Papers
123572, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uguewp:123572
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.123572
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uguewp:123572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dagueca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.