IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ufvdwp/53246.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efeitos redistributivos e determinantes de recebimento do ICMS Ecológico pelos municípios mineiros

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandes, Luciany Lima
  • Coelho, Alexandre Braganca
  • Fernandes, Elaine Aparecida
  • Lima, Joao Eustaquio de

Abstract

The ecological ICMS was first used to distribute a share of the ICMS revenue in the state of Parana in 1991. In the Minas Gerais State, the Ecological ICMS was implemented in 1995 with the “Robin Hood Law”. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change in the ICMS distribution in Minas Gerais caused by the introduction of the ecological criterion. Results showed that the distributional effects were small mainly due to the small percentage allocated to counties, benefiting mainly poor and small counties and harming most counties. A logit model was estimated to check the determinants of counties on receiving the Ecological ICMS. Results showed that counties area and the ICMS amount received by the value-added criterion had positive effect on the receiving probability. Regional variables were also important.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandes, Luciany Lima & Coelho, Alexandre Braganca & Fernandes, Elaine Aparecida & Lima, Joao Eustaquio de, 2009. "Efeitos redistributivos e determinantes de recebimento do ICMS Ecológico pelos municípios mineiros," Working Papers in Applied Economics 53246, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Departamento de Economia Rural.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ufvdwp:53246
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.53246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/53246/files/WP-07-2009-AgEcon.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.53246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ufvdwp:53246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drufvbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.