IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uflotp/15640.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cotton and Sugar Subsidies Decisions: WTO's Dispute Settlement System Rebalances the Agreement on Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Powell, Stephen J.
  • Schmitz, Andrew

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Powell, Stephen J. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2005. "The Cotton and Sugar Subsidies Decisions: WTO's Dispute Settlement System Rebalances the Agreement on Agriculture," Technical Papers 15640, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uflotp:15640
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15640/files/tp050001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Becker, Anthony D. & Judge, Rebecca P., 2012. "Measuring the Effects of Decoupled Payments on Indica Rice Production Under the 1996 and 2002 Farm Bills," Working Papers 120073, St. Olaf College, Department of Economic.
    2. Schmitz, Troy G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2012. "The Complexities of the Interface between Agricultural Policy and Trade," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Andrew Schmitz & Troy G. Schmitz & Paul Schure, 2008. "High Commodity Prices and the EU's Single Payment Scheme: Some Consequences of Double‐Dipping," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 523-531, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uflotp:15640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatpcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.