IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278364.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cotton Agricultural Chemical Use and Farming Practices in 1989

Author

Listed:
  • Crutchfield, Stephen R.

Abstract

In this report. A 1989 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey of cotton producers reveals that 82 percent of cotton acreage was fertilized with nitrogen, 93 percent was treated with herbicides, and 67 percent was treated with insecticides. The survey also found cotton producers were using nonchemical pest management practices, including cultivation on 97 percent of planted acreage and pest scouting programs on 56 percent of planted acreage. Soil conservation was not as widely adopted, partly due to climate and topography in cotton-growing regions. About 60 percent of the surveyed acreage contained a well on the operation, but not many respondents knew if the well contained pesticides or nitrates

Suggested Citation

  • Crutchfield, Stephen R., 1990. "Cotton Agricultural Chemical Use and Farming Practices in 1989," Staff Reports 278364, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278364
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278364/files/ers-report-499.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crutchfield, Stephen R. & Ribaudo, Marc O. & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Quiroga, Ricardo, 1992. "Economic and Environmental Impacts of Water Quality Restrictions on Agriculture: An Application to Cotton Farming," 1992 Annual Meeting, August 9-12, Baltimore, Maryland 271386, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.