IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Storage Subsidy Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Agriculture and Trade Analysis

Abstract

An analysis of generic 1-year storage subsidy programs shows that some increase in stocks could be expected compared with a market with no storage subsidy programs. Over a period of years, the result would be a lower level of stocks than under the current Farmer-Owned Reserve. Such a program, with caps on total stocks for wheat of 300 million bushels and for feed grains of 600 million bushels, would reduce stock levels from those experienced under current programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Agriculture and Trade Analysis, 1990. "Storage Subsidy Programs," Staff Reports 278363, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278363
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278363/files/ers-report-498.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pollack, Susan L. & Lynch, Lori & [editors], 1991. "Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309577, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.