IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278042.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Conservation Title Of The Food Security Act Of 1985: Challenge Of A Multiple-Objective Program

Author

Listed:
  • Ogg, Clayton W.

Abstract

Discretionary environmental provisions could add to the Conservation Reserve Program's (CRP) objectives but would complicate the program. Nationally consistent criteria for designating fields contributing to salinity and selenium pollution, groundwater declines, loss of wetland habitat, or groundwater pollution are not yet available. Particularly vexing for the CRP would be groundwater problems, since the main cropland contributors generally have not yet been identified, and such croplands may be widely dispersed. In spite of these challenges, enrollment of marginal acres contributing to several environmental problems offers economic advantages, especially if States take action to foster enrollment in watersheds actually subject to pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogg, Clayton W., 1988. "The Conservation Title Of The Food Security Act Of 1985: Challenge Of A Multiple-Objective Program," Staff Reports 278042, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278042
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278042/files/ers-report-355.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brandow, George E., 1977. "Policy for Commercial Agriculture, 1945-71," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Taff, Steven J. & Runge, C. Ford, 1986. "Supply Control, Conservation And Budget Restraint: Conflicting Instruments In The 1985 Farm Bill," Staff Papers 13857, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. K. L. Robinson, 1966. "Cost and Effectiveness of Recent Government Land Retirement Programs in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(1), pages 22-30.
    4. Shabman, Leonard, 1986. "The Conservation Reserve And Environmental Management:Possibilities And Limitations," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278138, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Sloggett, Gordon & Dickason, Clifford, 1986. "Ground-Water Mining in the United States," Agricultural Economic Reports 308008, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. G. E. Brandow, 1961. "Reshaping Farm Policy in 1961," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 43(5), pages 1019-1031.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Algozin, Kenneth A. & Huang, Wen-Yuan & Alt, Klaus F. & Crowder, Brad M., 1988. "Application Of A Groundwater Contamination Database For Natural Resources Policy Analysis," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270347, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Ogg, Clayton W. & Aillery, Marcel P. & Ribaudo, Marc O., 1989. "Implementing the Conservation Reserve Program: Analysis of Environmental Options," Agricultural Economic Reports 308077, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ogg, Clayton W., 1985. "Acreage Reduction Options In The 1985 Farm Bill Proposals," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278594, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1988. "Irrigated Agriculture On The High Plains: An Uncertain Future," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Bruce L. Gardner, 2006. "T.W. Schultz's Contributions to the Economic Analysis of U.S. Agriculture ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 326-331.
    4. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Zobbe, Henrik, 2002. "On The Foundation Of Agricultural Policy Research In The United States," Staff Papers 28644, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Myers, Robert J. & Oehmke, James F., 1987. "Instability and Risk as Rationales for Government Intervention in Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 200938, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Stan G. Daberkow & Katherine H. Reichelderfer, 1988. "Low-Input Agriculture: Trends, Goals, and Prospects for Input Use," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1159-1166.
    8. Nott, Sherrill B. & Hamm, Larry G., 1986. "Quotas for U.S. Dairy Farmers? A Review," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201361, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Stone, L. R. & Schlegel, A. J. & Gwin, R. E. & Khan, A. H., 1996. "Response of corn, grain sorghum, and sunflower to irrigation in the High Plains of Kansas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 251-259, May.
    10. Negri, Donald H. & Brooks, Douglas H., 1990. "Determinants Of Irrigation Technology Choice," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Addicott, Ethan T. & Fenichel, Eli P., 2019. "Spatial aggregation and the value of natural capital," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 118-132.
    12. Brandow, G.E., 1977. "PART III. Policy for Commerical Agriculture, 1945-71," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337215, january.
    13. Cleveland, Cutler J., 1995. "Resource degradation, technical change, and the productivity of energy use in U.S. agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 185-201, June.
    14. Kyed, Karsten & Kaergard, Niels & Zobbe, Henrik, 2002. "Multifunctionality and the European Common Agricultural Policy: A Theoretical Problem," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24876, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Negri, Donald H. & Brooks, Douglas H., 1988. "The Determinants Of Irrigation Technology Choice," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270403, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Day, John C. & Horner, Gerald L., 1987. "U.S. Irrigation: Extent and Economic Importance," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309386, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Reichelderfer, Katherine & Chambers, Robert G., 1987. "Agricultural Resource Conservation and Trade Policies: Are they Complementary or Inconsistent?," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270092, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Gardner, Bruce L., 1995. "The Federal Government in Farm Commodity Markets: Recent Reform Efforts in a Long-Term Context," Working Papers 197821, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Easter, K. William & Frerichs, Stephen, 1988. "Managing The Great Lakes Commons: An Evaluation Of Recent Institutional Changes," Economic Reports 13019, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Larson, Greg A. & Roloff, Glaucio & Runge, C. Ford & Larson, William E., 1987. "Marginal Agricultural Land Classification: A New Approach," Staff Papers 13598, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.