IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

U.S. Rice Farms: A Regional Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Dismukes, Robert

Abstract

U.S. farms growing rice varied considerably among seven rice-growing regions, according to the 1984 Farm Costs and Returns Survey. This report summarizes and compare the production practices and costs of production of U.S. rice farms. Costs per acre of rice were greatest in California and on the Lower Co st of Texas. Rice growers in Northeast Arkansas and the Mississippi River Delta received the most favorable returns from rice. Returns were least favorable on the Lower Coast of Texas.

Suggested Citation

  • Dismukes, Robert, 1988. "U.S. Rice Farms: A Regional Comparison," Staff Reports 278006, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278006
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278006/files/ers-report-335.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Setia, Parveen & Childs, Nathan & Wailes, Eric & Livezey, Janet, 1994. "The U.S. Rice Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305473, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.