IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/277577.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recreation Benefits From An Improvement In Water Quality At St. Albans Bay, Vermont

Author

Listed:
  • Ribaudo, Marc
  • Young, C. Edwin
  • Epp, Donald

Abstract

A 1982 survey of recreationists using the northeastern portion of Lake Champlain indicates that improving the water quality of St. Albans Bay, Vermont, would produce significant economic benefits. St. Albans Bay is currently suffering nutrient enrichment problems from both point and nonpoint sources. Applying the survey data to a travel cost model produced a benefit estimate for clean water of $537,000 per year for recreationists. Recreation benefits for clean water estimated by using the contingent rating method came to $230,000 per year. The two methods are compared and reasons give as to why the contingent rating results may be more accurate.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribaudo, Marc & Young, C. Edwin & Epp, Donald, 1984. "Recreation Benefits From An Improvement In Water Quality At St. Albans Bay, Vermont," Staff Reports 277577, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:277577
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277577/files/ers-report-107.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tay, Richard & McCarthy, Patrick S. & Fletcher, Jerald J., 1996. "A portfolio choice model of the demand for recreational trips," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 325-337, October.
    2. Libby, Lawrence W., 1985. "Who Should Pay for Nonpoint Pollution Abatement?," Staff Paper Series 200892, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:277577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.