IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssb/154692.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nonmetro, Metro, and U.S. Bank-Operating Statistics, 1986

Author

Listed:
  • Mikesell, James J.

Abstract

The financial condition of banks, both nonmetro and metro, generally deteriorated in 1986. Based on weighted statistics (which treat banks as an aggregate and may be dominated by a few large banks), aggregate profits for all U.S. banks fell 9 percent, expenditures to protect against upcoming loan losses rose 14 percent, and levels of problem loans rose 3 percent. Banks in the West and South had the lowest profits, the most problem loans, and the most loan losses in 1986, partly stemming from the troubled energy sector. Metro and nonmetro banks did not equally share these conditions. Differences in both the level and dynamics of change for metro and nonmetro operations appear when comparing all banks and when comparing narrow classifications such as bank size, loan and capital problems, local economic base (agricultural or energy), market extension, and regions. This report presents weighted and unweighted operating statistics for nonmetro, metro, and all u.s. banks for 1986, and comparisons with 1985.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikesell, James J., 1988. "Nonmetro, Metro, and U.S. Bank-Operating Statistics, 1986," Statistical Bulletin 154692, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154692
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.154692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/154692/files/sb787.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.154692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gajewski, Gregory & Hagerman, Deano, 1987. "Ailing Banks and S&L's Get Federal Help, But at What Risk?," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 4(1), October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.