Author
Listed:
- Martin, Sam W.
- Cleaves, Florena
Abstract
Excerpts from the report Introduction: Reliable classification of cotton requires that samples be adequately representative of the bales from which they are drawn. The manner of drawing the sample and other factors affecting its representativeness deserve more consideration than they have received. The importance of a properly drawn sample is too little recognized either by the one who draws the sample or by those who handle it before it is used as the basis of classification. This report presents information assembled through a recent study of various methods of sampling cotton in the United States and of closely related practices insofar as they are associated with representativeness of the samples drawn. It is known that disparities can and do occur in the classification of samples from the same bales of cotton by different classers. As presumably such disparities may be due in part to differences in samples, this study was made by the Bureau of Agricultural Economics to obtain information concerning the influence of different methods of sampling cotton and of closely associated practices on the representativeness of samples drawn. Consideration was given not only to the different methods of drawing samples from cotton bales and the distinguishing characteristics of the different types of samples, but also to (a) ginning and baling practices that affect representativeness of samples, such as plating of bales at the gin, and (b) handling of samples after they are drawn, such as trimming, rolling, and packing. These factors have an important bearing upon the proper classification of cotton bales. It is possible that comparison of the different methods of sampling employed in the different parts of the country, and of handling and caring for them after they have been drawn, might lead to better and more uniform practices.
Suggested Citation
Martin, Sam W. & Cleaves, Florena, 1936.
"Sampling American Cotton -- Prevailing Practices and Some Factors Affecting Representativeness of Samples,"
Miscellaneous Publications
333515, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uersmp:333515
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333515
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:333515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.