IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/320754.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Analysis of the Food Stamp Plan

Author

Listed:
  • Gold, Norman Leon
  • Hoffman, A. C.
  • Waugh, Frederick V.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: The study here reported shows that farmers, low-income consumers, and food dealers would all benefit substantially from an expansion of the Food Stamp Plan. If the plan were made available to all relief and Work Projects Administration families in the United States, the cost to the Federal Treasury would be about 400 million dollars a year. A plan of this size would be very effective in moving surplus foods into consumption and in improving the diets of low-income families. The authors believe that a 400-million-dollar annual subsidy for a National Food Stamp Plan could increase the income of farmers by at least the amount of the subsidy, and possibly somewhat more. These findings do not mean that the Food Stamp Plan is necessarily a substitute for other methods of farm relief nor that it should be considered to the exclusion of other methods of domestic surplus disposal, such as the school-lunch program and the Direct Purchase and Distribution Program. The report shows that in some respects full benefits of the plan were not being realized in the early stages of its operation and suggests some possibilities for improvement. On the whole, however, the plan seems to be working satisfactorily from the standpoint of all groups concerned, and a number of changes have been made to improve its operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gold, Norman Leon & Hoffman, A. C. & Waugh, Frederick V., 1940. "Economic Analysis of the Food Stamp Plan," Miscellaneous Publications 320754, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320754
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/320754/files/FoodStampPlan1940.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.320754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:320754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.