IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/316844.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Netherlands' Mixed Feed Industry: Its Impact on Use of Grain for Feed

Author

Listed:
  • Pearson, William E.
  • Friend, Reed E.

Abstract

Grain use in concentrated feeds in the Netherlands has declined because of increased use of lower cost substitutes. Manioc chips and meal and corn gluten are two major feed grain substitutes used in mixed feeds. High grain prices in the European Community have encouraged the use of grain substitutes. In addition, the Dutch mixed feed industry is highly developed, making extensive use of linear programing in formulating least-cost rations. Increased use of grain substitutes in other countries of the European Community is likely.

Suggested Citation

  • Pearson, William E. & Friend, Reed E., 1970. "The Netherlands' Mixed Feed Industry: Its Impact on Use of Grain for Feed," Miscellaneous Publications 316844, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:316844
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316844/files/ERSforeign287.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Friend, Reed E., 1971. "Use of Wheat for Feed in the European Economic Community, with Projections to 1975," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Johnson, D. Gale, 1977. "PART IV. Postwar Policies Relating to Trade in Agricultural Products," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337216, january.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:316844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.