Author
Listed:
- Van Arsdall, Roy N.
- Smith, Richard B.
- Stucker, Thomas A.
Abstract
This report discusses the prevention of surface water pollution with hog wastes from point sources, and relates it to major structural characteristics of hog production. Nonpoint source pollution, arising from pasture systems and the application of hog wastes to farmland, is recognized but not evaluated. This analysis centers on the 15 major hog-producing States. In 1969, they accounted for 511,000 farms selling hogs, and for 89 percent of U.S. hog output. A third of total sales came from 368,000 farms selling fewer than 200 hogs each annually; 12 percent of sales were from farms selling 1,000 head or more. Open-lot systems of production accounted for 58 percent of all systems; pasture, 33 percent; and total confinement, 9 percent. Uncontrolled runoff is estimated to occur on 112,000 farms; 86,000 of them use open-lot systems. Effluent guidelines used in this report were assumed, since EPA guidelines had not been issued when this study was made. Under these assumptions, application of runoff control facilities to open-lot systems with problems would require investments in the 15 States of $254 to $290 million, and increased annual costs of $36 to $44, or $0.90 to $1.00 per 100 pounds of hogs produced. Unit investments and annual costs would be over 10 times as great for the smallest as for the largest enterprises. After control adjustments are complete, water should be free of hog wastes; pork should cost consumers little or no more as a result of the clean-up program. During the adjustment period some producers, agribusiness firms, and rural communities will suffer; pork supplies are likely to drop and prices to rise. Undesirable economic impacts can be minimized through proper application of regulations
Suggested Citation
Van Arsdall, Roy N. & Smith, Richard B. & Stucker, Thomas A., 1974.
"Economic Impact of Controlling Surface Water Runoff from Point Sources in U.S. Hog Production,"
Agricultural Economic Reports
307510, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uerser:307510
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307510
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.