IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/307324.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Evaluation of Starch Use in the Textile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, Clarence A.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Summary: The demand for starch in textile manufacturing derives from the demand for and supply conditions of the end products of the industry. Roughly 13 percent of the traditional market for textiles was lost over the last two decades to nontextile materials such as paper, plastics, rubber, and glass. Also, domestic consumption of natural fibers decreased in proportion to the amount of manmade fibers in textiles. Cotton contributed almost 80 percent of the total cotton-equivalent pounds of fibers used annually during 1940-44, but only 52 percent during 1960-64. It is becoming increasingly important that chemicals be "tailor-made" for more specialized tasks in textile sizing, printing, and finishing. The increasing number of different fibers, yarn counts, blends, and fabrics tends to insure, for example, that a sizing agent that performs well for one yarn will not do so for the majority of others. Consequently, starch's economic competitive position will be maintained or improved by the starch industry's ability to provide modified and starch-derived products applicable for sizing the wide variety of yarns and fabrics being woven. Technology is the key to its potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, Clarence A., 1967. "An Economic Evaluation of Starch Use in the Textile Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 307324, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307324
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307324/files/aer109.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:307324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.