IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersap/340102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

COVID-19 Working Paper: Unpriced Commodity Inventory and COVID-19 Pandemic Assistance

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Noah
  • Giri, Anil K.
  • Subedi, Dipak
  • Williams, Ryan

Abstract

The first round of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP 1) provided payments to agricultural producers adversely affected by marketing losses caused by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Since the only producers eligible to receive a CFAP 1 payment were those who held unpriced inventory, ERS researchers examined the level of unpriced inventory held post-harvest 2019. Administrative USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA) data on CFAP 1 applications and payments, and farm-level data on unpriced inventory were drawn from the 2019 Phase 3 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) to understand unpriced inventory held and CFAP 1 payments distributed to agricultural producers. For the majority of producers, significant levels of inventory existed post-harvest 2019. Since payments were made on the lower of 50 percent of production or the level of unpriced inventory, the majority of payments were made on production levels, from 58 percent of upland cotton payments to 81 percent of spring wheat payments. ERS researchers also analyzed the degree to which commodity-specific CFAP 1 rates reflected changes in county-average cash prices between January and April 2020 for corn, soybeans, and spring wheat. The share of counties in which the CFAP 1 rate exceeded 52.5 percent of the decline in cash prices ranged between 49.0 percent for corn and 99.9 percent for spring wheat.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Noah & Giri, Anil K. & Subedi, Dipak & Williams, Ryan, 2023. "COVID-19 Working Paper: Unpriced Commodity Inventory and COVID-19 Pandemic Assistance," Administrative Publications 340102, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersap:340102
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340102/files/ap-117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander E. Saak, 2003. "Spatial and Temporal Marketing Considerations under Marketing Loan Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 872-887.
    2. Coppess, Jonathan & Schnitkey, Gary & Paulson, Nick & Zulauf, Carl, 2017. "Farm Bill Review: Historical Background on Marketing Assistance Loans," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 7, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Athey, 2002. "Monotone Comparative Statics under Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 187-223.
    2. Swanson, Krista & Schnitkey, Gary & Zulauf, Carl & Coppess, Jonathan & Paulson, Nick, 2022. "Administration Efforts to Incentivize Production due to Ukraine-Russia Conflict," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 12(67), May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Agricultural Finance; Crop Production/Industries; Demand and Price Analysis; Marketing; Public Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersap:340102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.