IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/309707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costs and Structure of U.S. Hog Production, 1988-91

Author

Listed:
  • Shapouri, Hosein
  • Mathews, Kenneth H., Jr.
  • Bailey, Pat

Abstract

Hog producers' receipts and costs from 1988 through 1991 showed that net returns peaked in 1990. Hog and pig prices were higher than in 1988-89 with lower feed prices, which also increased returns for feeder pig producing and feeder pig finishing operations in 1990. The decline in net returns in 1991 was caused by lower prices in that year for slaughter hogs, feeder pigs, and cull hogs. Improved technologies led to more efficient production. Feed use declined 14 percent, or 60 pounds, per hundredweight of hogs and pigs sold from 1980 to 1988, with the North Central States showing the lowest feed expenses. Litter size continued an upward trend. Operations have on average become larger, with the large firms weaning more pigs per litter earlier at smaller weights and marketing hogs at slightly lower weights, although such large firms have relatively higher expenses for veterinary costs and labor. In all, the large operations were not much more profitable than the small ones, with the increased profits coming mostly from increased volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Shapouri, Hosein & Mathews, Kenneth H., Jr. & Bailey, Pat, 1994. "Costs and Structure of U.S. Hog Production, 1988-91," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309707, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309707
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309707/files/aib692.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.