IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313774.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Experimental Grading Line for Washing, Sizing, and Sorting Sweet Potatoes Before Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Kushman, L. J.
  • Hamann, D. D.
  • Brantley, S. A.

Abstract

An experimental grading line capable of washing, sizing, and sorting sweetpotatoes before storage was assembled in 1972 and tested in a continuing effort to develop a system that will harvest in bulk and therefore simplify and speed up harvesting, provide an opportunity to sort clean roots under good working conditions, and permit sizing of roots mechanically instead of visually by workers. Field-graded roots were run over the grading line seven times and field-run roots one time at approximately weekly intervals through the harvest season. Washing with water under high pressure adequately cleaned the roots in the absence of brushes, which usually cause injury. In all runs, removal of jumbos, canners, and No. 2's increased the percentage of No. 1's considerably. After grading, not less than 87 percent of the roots met No. 1 grade specifications, and gains in storage space were 17 to 36 percent for field-graded roots and 45 percent for field-run roots. Under good curing conditions and after washing, sizing, and sorting, roots lost about the same amount of weight and were about as free of decay as roots placed directly under curing conditions. When curing conditions were bad, roots washed, sized, and sorted did not keep as well as untreated roots and were in poor condition after storage. Treating roots with hot water (125° F for 2 1/2 minutes) was slightly detrimental to roots and was not necessary because black rot was not present. Chlorine in the dump washer (75 to 100 parts per million) or in the hot-water tank (30 to 50 parts per million) reduced losses from decay in two of three tests in which untreated roots did not keep well. In supplementary tests, the amount of root injury incurred on the experimental grading line was compared with that caused by a conventional grading line, and results showed that the experimental grading line caused less injury. Other test results showed that curing roots immediately after washing, sizing, and sorting for 4 days at 85° F kept weight losses reasonably low. A subjective evaluation of an entirely new grading line, built in 1973 for commercial operation, is also presented in this publication.

Suggested Citation

  • Kushman, L. J. & Hamann, D. D. & Brantley, S. A., 1977. "Experimental Grading Line for Washing, Sizing, and Sorting Sweet Potatoes Before Storage," Marketing Research Reports 313774, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313774
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313774/files/mrr1067.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kushman, L. J. & Wright, W. R. & Kaufman, J. & Hardenburg, R. E., 1965. "Fungicidal Treatments and Shipping Practices for Controlling Decay of Sweetpotatoes During Marketing," Marketing Research Reports 313440, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.