Author
Listed:
- Hruschka, Howard W.
- Wang, Chien Yi
Abstract
Storage and shelf-life tests were conducted with watercress, parsley, and mint grown in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. The vegetables were trucked under container and top ice to the Washington, D.C., area, where they were purchased the day after harvest and hauled to Beltsville, Md., for testing. In packaging tests before storage, watercress and mint held up well at 0° C and 95 percent relative humidity for up to 4 weeks in perforated polyethylene bags but only 4 days in naked bunches, whereas at 20° and 60 percent relative humidity they held up for only 2 and 4 days, respectively, in polyethylene bags and 1 day or less in naked bunches. In limited storage tests using container and top ice, watercress and parsley held up well for 2 to 3 weeks and mint for 2 weeks at 0° C. After crate storage and subsequent packaging in polyethylene bags, the bunches of parsley remained salable at 0° C for 21 to 36 days beyond 4 weeks' storage and up to 14 days beyond 8 weeks' storage. At 10°, bunches in polyethylene remained salable for 4 to 6 days beyond the 4 and 8 weeks' storage. Parsley bunches packaged after 0° storage in cartons or crates with container and top ice had longer shelf life than bunches from containers stored dry without ice. Data are included on weight loss and wilt for the three greens. Respiration rates were highest for parsley, next for watercress, and lowest for mint. Initial reduced ascorbic acid content was about 48, 93, and 34 mg per 100 grams, respectively, for watercress, parsley, and mint. Reduced ascorbic acid content of parsley dropped during storage and shelf life. Higher losses of ascorbic acid were associated with higher holding temperatures and higher weight, turgor, and general appearance losses.
Suggested Citation
Hruschka, Howard W. & Wang, Chien Yi, 1979.
"Storage and Shelf Life of Packaged Watercress, Parsley, and Mint,"
Marketing Research Reports
313269, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313269
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313269
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.