IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313166.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economics of Delinting Cottonseed to Low Residual Linters at Oil Mills

Author

Listed:
  • Perdue, Elmer J.
  • Clark, S. P.

Abstract

Excerpt from the report: Management of a cooperative or other cottonseed mill needs to determine its most profitable levels of delinting under varying prices for chemical linters. The major objectives of this study were: (1) To define and evaluate factors that affect costs and sales values of chemical cotton linters; and (2) to develop procedures whereby mill management can apply their individual cost and revenue data to determine how close to delint cottonseed under varying prices of chemical linters.

Suggested Citation

  • Perdue, Elmer J. & Clark, S. P., 1965. "Economics of Delinting Cottonseed to Low Residual Linters at Oil Mills," Marketing Research Reports 313166, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313166
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313166/files/mrr720.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Campbell, John D., 1971. "Potential for Reducing Cooperative Cotton Ginning Costs in Arkansas: Consolidation, Central Ginning, Vertical Coordination," Farmer Cooperative Research Report (FCRR) 314185, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.