IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/313152.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of Mechanically Drawn Samples with Cut Samples for Evaluating Cotton Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Cable, C. Curtis, Jr.
  • Smith, Harvin R.
  • Looney, Zolon M.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: The manufacture and use of mechanical cotton samplers began in 1955. By the beginning of the 1961-62 ginning season, 195 mechanical samplers had been installed. This indicates that some producers and marketing firms have accepted mechanically drawn samples, and that they apparently feel this method of sampling offers opportunities for improvements in cotton packaging and merchandising methods. However, many industry leaders are opposed to mechanical sampling of cotton for various reasons. Some may have a natural tendency to resist changes and adjustments in operations associated with technological developments. Also, many firms are uncertain as to whether grade, staple length, and other quality characteristics based on a mechanical sample differ significantly from those based on a cut sample from the same bale. To help resolve this uncertainty, the U.S. Department of Agriculture initiated a study in the fall of 1959 to obtain basic information on the comparative quality measurements of mechanically drawn and cut samples from the same bales. The specific objectives of this study were to (1) compare mechanically drawn samples with cut samples for determining initial grade, staple length, color, and other quality characteristics of cotton, and (2) ascertain the usefulness of mechanical samples stored 2 years for evaluating quality changes in bales also stored for a period of 2 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Cable, C. Curtis, Jr. & Smith, Harvin R. & Looney, Zolon M., 1964. "Comparison of Mechanically Drawn Samples with Cut Samples for Evaluating Cotton Quality," Marketing Research Reports 313152, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313152
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313152/files/mrr654.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cable, C. Curtis, Jr., 1966. "Marketing Cotton and Cotton Textiles," Miscellaneous Publications 321049, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:313152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.