IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/311348.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mechanical Sampling of Cotton

Author

Listed:
  • Cooper, Maurice R.
  • Campbell, J. D.
  • Pritchard, D. L.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report: During the past 5 years mechanical devices for sampling cotton bales during ginning have been installed in approximately 153 United States gins. Over 90 percent of the mechanical samplers are in Texas and California. The mechanical method of sampling, originally developed by researchers of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, was designed primarily to overcome the main shortcomings of the conventional method of cutting the bale. These shortcomings are the limited proportion of the individual bale represented by cut samples, the ragged appearance and surface contamination of the bales, and other disadvantages attributable to cutting holes in two sides of the bale. This study was made to provide information helpful in evaluating the two methods of sampling and in recognizing and overcoming barriers to the wider use of mechanical sampling. The information was obtained mainly during 1958 and 1959 by personal interview and by mail questionnaire from representatives of the domestic cotton industry, sampler manufacturers, and others with experience relating to both mechanical and conventional sampling.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooper, Maurice R. & Campbell, J. D. & Pritchard, D. L., 1960. "Mechanical Sampling of Cotton," Marketing Research Reports 311348, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311348
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311348/files/mrr412.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lafferty, D. G. & Cooper, Maurice R., 1958. "Preprocessing Practices and Costs of United States Textile Mills as Affected by the Cotton Bale Package," Marketing Research Reports 310854, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    2. Bolt, Charles D. & Wilmeth, Jo Brice, 1958. "Statistical Supplement to Handling Bales of Cotton in Public Warehouses: Methods and Equipment," Marketing Research Reports 310851, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    3. Wilmeth, Jo Brice & Bolt, Charles D., 1958. "Handling Bales of Cotton in Public Warehouses: Methods and Equipment," Marketing Research Reports 310850, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cable, C. Curtis, Jr., 1966. "Marketing Cotton and Cotton Textiles," Miscellaneous Publications 321049, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.