IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ualbsp/24086.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficiency and Technical Progress in Traditional and Modern Agriculture: Evidence from Rice Production in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Xiaosong
  • Jeffrey, Scott R.

Abstract

Productive efficiency for Chinese hybrid and conventional rice production is estimated using a dual stochastic frontier efficiency decomposition model. Results reveal significant differences in technical and allocative efficiency between conventional and hybrid rice production, and indicate significant regional efficiency differences in hybrid rice production, but not in conventional rice production.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Xiaosong & Jeffrey, Scott R., 1995. "Efficiency and Technical Progress in Traditional and Modern Agriculture: Evidence from Rice Production in China," Staff Paper Series 24086, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ualbsp:24086
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24086/files/sp950002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehta, Niti, 2011. "Liberalised Era and Technical Efficiency in Agriculture: Variations in Gujarat and West Bengal," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(2), pages 1-16.
    2. Adegbite, O. & Adeoye, I. B., 2015. "Technical Efficiency of Pineapple Production in Osun State, Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ualbsp:24086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drualca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.