Author
Listed:
- Haigh, Richard J.
- Kisko, Adrienne L.
Abstract
The current crisis in Canadian agriculture is well documented. Researchers are pointing to the declining ability of farmers to support local communities as a result of cost-price squeezes and high debt loads. These problems have been directly associated with the rural community crisis, which in Alberta is one of dwindling populations, an aging demographic base and depressed local economies. There is little doubt that the crisis in these two sectors is real, but the suggested linkages between them are open to question. The survivability of rural communities is not exclusively tied to agricultural profits. While beleaguered Alberta farmers seem to be compounding their reduced spending .by trading with nearby cities rather than the local community, of even greater relevance is the presence of industries which encourage population growth. Agriculture is no longer a major contributor to the creation of rural employment, particularly in prairie Canada where the technologies of extensive production have replaced labor inputs with capital investment. The argument being presented here is that the crisis of rural communities is related to the crisis in agriculture only to the extent of reduced local spending. This is a serious problem, but the major issue is one of dwindling populations. The decline of agricultural jobs in Alberta is for the most part, not the product of the crisis. To the contrary, it represents a long term trend toward mechanization and increased efficiency. Studies conducted in this province suggest that the survival of rural communities is increasingly tied to urban economies and values. Those communities which are able to attract urban industrial developments or provide a residential base for urban workers clearly show the greatest propensity for future growth. Inevitably this is producing a spatial bias in their distribution across the rural landscape.
Suggested Citation
Haigh, Richard J. & Kisko, Adrienne L., 1989.
"Rural Decline and the Farm Crisis: Two Marginally Related Issues,"
Staff Paper Series
232431, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ualbsp:232431
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232431
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ualbsp:232431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drualca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.