IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ttudco/96673.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Declining Cotton Acreage Impacts On U.S. Cotton Ginning Industry Structure And Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Mutuc, Maria Erlinda M.
  • Hudson, Darren

Abstract

The United States cotton industry has seen sustained reductions in cotton acreage since 2006 that coincided with increased production of biofuels that afforded higher returns to crops such as corn, among others, from which biofuels are derived. With lower cotton production following reduced acreage, the average number of bales processed per gin in the U.S. declined from 26,920 bales in 2006 to 17,453 in 2008. As a result of this lower effective demand, higher-capacity gins are constrained to produce at lower volumes below their minimum efficient scale at higher costs. On the other hand, smaller capacity gins now operate closer to their minimum efficient scale which makes them more cost-effective in producing lower volumes. This paper evaluates how the recent declines in cotton acreage have affected the structure and costs faced by cotton gins in the U.S.

Suggested Citation

  • Mutuc, Maria Erlinda M. & Hudson, Darren, 2010. "Declining Cotton Acreage Impacts On U.S. Cotton Ginning Industry Structure And Costs," Conference Papers 96673, Texas Tech University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ttudco:96673
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.96673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/96673/files/DecliningCottonGin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.96673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ttudco:96673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dattuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.