IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sdsusp/32032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Analysis Prepared for the Environmental Impact Statement on Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Conservation and Management on the Nebraska National Forest and Associated Units

Author

Listed:
  • Beutler, Martin

Abstract

This limited analysis resulted from a request by the Nebraska National Forest to provide some economic estimates to the value of changes in forage availability that would result from three proposed levels of rodenticide use in the management of black-tailed prairie dogs (BTPD) on the Nebraska National Forest (NNF) and associated units managed by NNF (i.e. Buffalo Gap National Grasslands, Ft. Pierre National Grasslands in South Dakota, and the Oglala National Grasslands in Nebraska.) The values of changes in forage availability were determined based on three alternatives of rodenticide use. These alternatives include: (1) limit use of rodenticides to only protect public health & safety and maintain facilities; (2) maintain a 1 mile buffer zone to prevent encroachment of BTPDs onto adjacent private or tribal agricultural land; and (3) provide a 1 mile buffer zone in the Conata Basin area (under specific conditions), ¼ mile buffer on the Ft. Pierre National Grasslands, and ½ mile buffer everywhere else. Two levels of estimates were provided by the NNF estimating the change in available forage from BTPD expansion given: (1) normal to above normal precipitation, and (2) below normal precipitation; over a 10 year period. Forage change estimates where provided by the NNF in pounds and in terms of Animal Unit Months (AUMs) of grazing. A 3 year average of hay prices ($70.00/ton) and AUM rates ($16.63/AUM) from the SD Agricultural Statistic Service were used to value the change in forage availability. The results of this analysis showed that under Alternative 1, the value of the change in forage availability in pounds range from loss of $79,870 to $212,065 from the low to high projected expansion of BTPD colonies. In terms of AUM value this loss ranged from $48,686 to $129,208. Under Alternative 2, the value of the change in forage availability in pounds range from a gain of $59,185 to $62,860 from the low to high projected decrease in BTPD colonies. In terms of AUM value this gain ranged from $36,029 to $38,274. With respect to Alternative 3, there was an overall gain in value from the reduction of BTPD colonies. In terms of pounds of available forage this value ranged from $9,065 to $23,835 and in AUM value from $5,506 to $14,521. Only the Ft. Pierre National Grassland had a loss of value under the low BTPD expansion estimate of $2,065 in the value per ton and $1,264 in the AUM value under Alternative 3.

Suggested Citation

  • Beutler, Martin, 2004. "Economic Analysis Prepared for the Environmental Impact Statement on Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Conservation and Management on the Nebraska National Forest and Associated Units," Economics Staff Papers 32032, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:sdsusp:32032
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32032/files/sp040002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sdsusp:32032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edsdsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.