Author
Listed:
- Taylor, Donald C.
- Feuz, Dillon M.
- Guan, Ming
Abstract
This is an exploratory study of "organic" versus "sustainable" agriculture applied to fed cattle production. Two interrelated premises underlie the study. The paramount factors considered in current certification standards for organic beef production, in our judgment, are (1) protection of animal health and welfare and (2) production of a differentiated product intended to be conducive to consumer health and which, therefore, will command a price premium in the market. Second, we believe the concept of sustainability embraces concerns extending beyond those currently embodied in organic production standards. · The theme of organic versus sustainable fed cattle production is examined through development and verification of two production indices: a Producer Organic Index (POI) and a Producer Sustainability Index (PSI). The POI reflects current production standards for organically certified beef. The PSI reflects a broader range of concerns, including long-term natural resource conservation and economic staying-power of cattle producers. Results of the study show there may be only a loose connection between current certification standards for organic beef production and conditions for sustainable beef production. Factors conducive to production of organic and sustainable beef production are identified. The methodology embodied in development of the producer indices can be used to provide insights to beef cattle extension specialists and individual cattle producers on strengths and weaknesses in current feedlot management practices.
Suggested Citation
Taylor, Donald C. & Feuz, Dillon M. & Guan, Ming, 1995.
"Organic Versus Sustainable Fed Cattle Production: A South Dakota Case Study,"
Economics Staff Papers
232238, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:sdsusp:232238
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232238
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sdsusp:232238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edsdsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.