IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/queddp/275157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Domestic Monopoly as a Domestic Distortion

Author

Listed:
  • Stegemann, Klaus

Abstract

Trade theorists have recognized for at least thirty years that domestic monopoly may cause a "domestic price distortion" with the result that a country's foreign trade is not optimized under laisser—faire conditions. Surprisingly, no one appears to have investigated the question as to how the monopolistic distortion could persist under conditions of free trade. Within the framework of conventional trade theory the case of a domestic monopoly is an empty box, as the alleged distortion disappears without intervention when free trade exists. The distortion can, however, be resurrected by assuming either a less than perfectly elastic supply of imports or imperfect substitutability between domestic and imported products. The distortion is likely to be important during periods of underutilized capacity when import-competing producers refuse to cut domestic prices to the level of short-run marginal cost. The theoretical argument has several important implications for trade policy in the post-Tokyo-Round era.

Suggested Citation

  • Stegemann, Klaus, 1979. "Domestic Monopoly as a Domestic Distortion," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275157, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:queddp:275157
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275157/files/QUEENS-IER-PAPER-379.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:queddp:275157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.