IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332686.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating Extended Supply‐Use Tables in Basic Prices with Firm Heterogeneity for the United States: A Proof of Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Fetzer, James
  • Howells III, Thomas F.
  • Jones, Lin
  • Strassner, Erich
  • Wang, Zhi

Abstract

This paper presents proof-of-concept trade-in-value added (TiVA) statistics estimated from extended supply-use tables for the United States that account for firm heterogeneity. The tables used to estimate the TiVA statistics extend recently-introduced supply-use tables for the United States by disaggregating the components of supply and use by multinational and other firms. Recent research has shown both the advantages of measuring trade on a value added basis when analyzing bilateral trade flows and the dominance of multinational enterprises in U.S. trade in goods and services. Our TiVA statistics for the United States include measures based on traditional supply-use presentations as well as statistics that reflect firm-level heterogeneity for the year 2011. The comparative analysis of the two sets of statistics allows us to understand better how firms within industries engage in global value chains and if the incorporation of firm heterogeneity provides a more accurate measurement of TiVA. We find that domestic value added as a share of the value of exports is similar within large industry groups. However, there is much more variation in the value added share of exports when firm type is accounted for. Also, the additional granularity shows the share of this value added that comes directly from the producing industry varies much more across industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Fetzer, James & Howells III, Thomas F. & Jones, Lin & Strassner, Erich & Wang, Zhi, 2016. "Estimating Extended Supply‐Use Tables in Basic Prices with Firm Heterogeneity for the United States: A Proof of Concept," Conference papers 332686, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332686/files/7863.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Fetzer & Erich H. Strassner, 2015. "Identifying Heterogeneity in the Production Components of Globally Engaged Business Enterprises in the United States," BEA Working Papers 0130, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    2. James Fetzer & Erich Strassner, 2015. "Identifying Heterogeneity in the Production Components of Globally Engaged Business Enterprises in the United States," EcoMod2015 8741, EcoMod.
    3. Heiwai Tang & Fei Wang & Zhi Wang, 2014. "The Domestic Segment of Global Supply Chains in China under State Capitalism," CESifo Working Paper Series 4797, CESifo.
    4. Johnson, Robert C. & Noguera, Guillermo, 2012. "Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 224-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James J. Fetzer & Tina Highfill & Kassu W. Hossiso & Thomas F. Howells III & Erich H. Strassner & Jeffrey A. Young, 2021. "Accounting for Firm Heterogeneity within US Industries: Extended Supply-Use Tables and Trade in Value Added Using Enterprise and Establishment Level Data," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges of Globalization in the Measurement of National Accounts, pages 311-342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. James J. Fetzer & Tina Highfill & Kassu W. Hossiso & Thomas F. Howells III & Erich H. Strassner & Jeffrey A. Young, 2018. "Accounting for Firm Heterogeneity within U.S. Industries: Extended Supply-Use Tables and Trade in Value Added using Enterprise and Establishment Level Data," BEA Working Papers 0158, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    3. ITO Koji & Ivan DESEATNICOV & FUKAO Kyoji, 2017. "Japanese Plants' Heterogeneity in Sales, Factor Inputs, and Participation in Global Value Chains," Discussion papers 17117, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Fabienne Fortanier & Guannan Miao & Ans Kolk & Niccolò Pisani, 2020. "Accounting for firm heterogeneity in global value chains," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(3), pages 432-453, April.
    5. Mario Marcel & Diego Vivanco, 2021. "Measuring Small and Medium-Size Enterprises Contribution to Trade in Value Added: The case of Chile 2013-2016," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 914, Central Bank of Chile.
    6. Johannes Eugster & Giovanni Donato, 2022. "The exchange rate elasticity of the Swiss current account," Working Papers 2022-14, Swiss National Bank.
    7. Jon Samuels & Erich Strassner, 2019. "Toward a Global Integrated Industry-level Production Account: A Proposal," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 36, pages 7-33, Spring.
    8. Holger Görg & Dennis Görlich, 2015. "Offshoring, wages and job security of temporary workers," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 151(3), pages 533-554, August.
    9. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Saygılı, Hülya, 2017. "Production fragmentation and factor price convergence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 535-544.
    11. Carlo Piccardi & Lucia Tajoli & Riccardo Vitali, 2024. "Patterns of variability in the structure of global value chains: a network analysis," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(3), pages 1009-1036, August.
    12. Ke Zhang & Xingwei Wang, 2021. "Pollution Haven Hypothesis of Global CO 2 , SO 2 , NO x —Evidence from 43 Economies and 56 Sectors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Huiyao Chen & Changyuan Luo & Mary-Françoise Renard & Shiyi Sun, 2021. "EU-China Trade and intra-EU Trade: Substitute or Complementary?," Working Papers hal-03467473, HAL.
    14. Pol Antràs & Robert W. Staiger, 2012. "Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3140-3183, December.
    15. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Gröschl, Jasmin & Heiland, Inga, 2022. "Complex Europe: Quantifying the cost of disintegration," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. d'Artis Kancs, 2022. "Enhancing Resilience: Model-based Simulations," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2022/10, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    17. repec:ocp:rpecon:rp_20-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Roman Stöllinger, 2019. "Testing the Smile Curve: Functional Specialisation in GVCs and Value Creation," wiiw Working Papers 163, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    19. Myoung Shik Choi & Bongsuk Sung & Woo-Yong Song, 2019. "The Effects of the Exchange Rate on Value-Added International Trade to Enhance Free Trade Sustainability in GVCs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2020. "Wage response to global production links: evidence for workers from 28 European countries (2005–2014)," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(4), pages 769-801, November.
    21. Amador, João & Cabral, Sónia, 2014. "Global value chains: surveying drivers and measures," Working Paper Series 1739, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    JEL classification:

    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.