IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332627.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs of Achieving a Global Climate Change Mitigation Target: An Integrated Assessment Model Inter-Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Daigneault, Adam
  • Fernandez, Mario

Abstract

We use the New Zealand Integrated Assessment Modelling System (NZIAMS) that includes a global dynamic CGE model, a global timber model, and a simple climate model to assess the potential economic and climate change impacts of meeting a range of long-run GHG emissions reduction targets. The model is configured to 6 regions and 18 aggregated sectors (including several energy sources and land activities), and includes several sources of GHG emissions abatement, including forest carbon sequestration and electricity generation with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). In this paper, we assess the impacts of meeting a Kyoto GHG emissions concentration of 500 and 450 parts per million (ppm) in 2100, with and without GHG prices imposed on the agricultural sector. We estimate that global net emissions in 2100 would need to be reduced by 85 to 90% relative to the baseline case to achieve 500 ppm and by 98-103% to meet the 450 ppm target. GHG emissions price estimates range from $44 to 76/tCO2e in 2030 and from $503 to $1,816/tCO2e in 2070. Major sources of abatement include the switching most of the world’s electricity generation to either renewable energy or CCS and planting several 100s of million hectares of trees. All policy scenarios were estimated to reduce global GDP relative to the baseline, particularly in the second half of the century. For the scenarios that price GHG emissions from all sectors, GDP is reduced by 1.6 to 2.0% in 2030 while GDP in 2070 could be reduced by 7 to 9%. For the scenarios that excluded agriculture from GHG pricing, global GDP impacts decrease by 1.7 to 2.2% in 2030 and by 13 to 18% in 2070. This suggests that excluding agriculture could have a dramatic increase on global economic impacts as the increase in GHG price on all emissions from all other sectors to meet the 2100 GHG concentration target dominate the potential increases in economic output that could be achieved from not pricing agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Daigneault, Adam & Fernandez, Mario, 2015. "The Costs of Achieving a Global Climate Change Mitigation Target: An Integrated Assessment Model Inter-Comparison," Conference papers 332627, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332627/files/7369.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burfisher,Mary E., 2011. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766968, December.
    2. Ottmar Edenhofer , Brigitte Knopf, Terry Barker, Lavinia Baumstark, Elie Bellevrat, Bertrand Chateau, Patrick Criqui, Morna Isaac, Alban Kitous, Socrates Kypreos, Marian Leimbach, Kai Lessmann, Bertra, 2010. "The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    3. Burfisher,Mary E., 2011. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521139779, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozana Nadoveza & Marija Penava, 2016. "Building Computable General Equilibrium Model Of Croatia," EFZG Working Papers Series 1605, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    2. M. Alejandro Cardenete & M. Carmen Lima & Ferran Sancho, 2013. "Are There Key Sectors? An Appraisal Using Applied General Equilibrium," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2,3), pages 111-129, Winter.
    3. Widodo, Tri & Fitrady, Ardyanto & Alim Rosyadi, Saiful & Erdyas Bimanatya, Traheka, 2018. "A Long-Run Estimation of Natural Gas Demand in Indonesian Manufacturing Sector: Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach," MPRA Paper 86887, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    5. Fiorini, Matteo; Lebrand, Mathilde, 2016. "The Political Economy of Services Trade Agreements," Economics Working Papers ECO2016/05, European University Institute.
    6. Lisenkova, Katerina & Mérette, Marcel & Wright, Robert, 2013. "Population ageing and the labour market: Modelling size and age-specific effects," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 981-989.
    7. Tianren Yang, 2020. "Understanding commuting patterns and changes: Counterfactual analysis in a planning support framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1440-1455, October.
    8. Wang, X. & Dietrich, J.P. & Lotze-Campen, H. & Biewald, A. & Munson, T.S. & Muller, C., 2018. "Trading More Food in the Context of High-end Climate Change: Implications for Land Displacement through Agricultural Trade," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276997, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2012. "The Role Of Supply Constraints In Multiplier Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 21-34, June.
    10. Zhou, Jing & Latorre, María C., 2014. "How FDI influences the triangular trade pattern among China, East Asia and the U.S.? A CGE analysis of the sector of Electronics in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(S1), pages 77-88.
    11. J. Edward Taylor & Karen Thome, 2012. "A Methodology for Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation (LEWIE) of Cash Transfers," One Pager 183, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    12. Mario A. Fernandez & Adam J. Daigneault, 2018. "Money Does Grow On Trees: Impacts Of The Paris Agreement On The New Zealand Economy," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Oscar Bajo-Rubio & Antonio G. Gómez-Plana, 2015. "Alternative strategies to reduce public deficits: Taxes vs. spending," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 18, pages 45-70, May.
    14. Ramón E. Key-Hernández & Claudina Villarroel, 2014. "Domestic impact of production cuts in OPEC countries: The cases of Nigeria and Venezuela," EcoMod2014 7007, EcoMod.
    15. Rose, Adam & Chen, Zhenhua & Wei, Dan & Prager, Fynn, 2015. "Estimating the Macroeconomic Impacts of U.S. Anti-Dumping Enforcement," Conference papers 332572, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Vanzetti, David & Pham, Huong Thi Lan, 2015. "Trade Liberalisation and Rural Poverty in Vietnam," Conference papers 332662, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Orlov, Anton, 2015. "An assessment of optimal gas pricing in Russia: A CGE approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 492-506.
    18. Sartori, Martina, 2017. "CGE modeling for the economic assessment of mega-events: A tentative cookbook," Conference papers 332841, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Proque, Andressa Lemes & Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Perobelli, Fernando Salgueiro, 2022. "Fuel tax, cross subsidy and transport: Assessing the effects on income and consumption distribution in Brazil," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    20. Leone Walters & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Matthew W. Clance, 2016. "The Impact of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Free Trade Agreement on the South African Economy," Working Papers 201669, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.