IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332504.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What does the future hold for the poor in Ghana? An assessment of the impact of climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Van Dijk, Michiel
  • Kuiper, Marijke
  • Shutes, Lindsay

Abstract

Ghana is considered a ‘success story’ of development in Africa. A growth rate of more than four per cent over the last two decades has resulted in an almost doubling of GDP and a dramatic improvement in poverty and food security. As a consequence, the country is on track to achieve MDG1 – halving the proportion of poor and hungry people – before 2015 and there is a strong likelihood that Ghana will achieve its goal of becoming a middle income country by 2020. Nevertheless, the government has recently identified climate change as a major threat to economic growth and development. The exact impact of climate change depends on the size of the shock which is subject to uncertainty. This paper examines climate change as a potential threat to Ghana’s development by evaluating the impact of a range of climate change scenarios. The effect of climate change shocks on the lives of people will differ across households, depending on income, occupation, gender and location. It is expected that climate change will be particularly damaging to the agricultural sector, which, at 36 per cent of GDP, is a major contributor to economic growth. It is likely to negatively impact the cocoa sector which is an important source of export earnings. Climate change could therefore disproportionally affect the livelihoods of the rural poor and small scale (cocoa) farmers. Furthermore, through the effects of higher food prices and diminishing economic growth, climate change may also have a negative impact on income and food security of the urban population. Finally, since climate change is a global phenomenon, poverty and food conditions in Ghana will be affected by developments in other countries transmitted through international trade and foreign direct investment. This may offer opportunities, e.g. in terms of increased exports to countries whose agricultural production is negatively affected, but may also pose threats if crucial imports or investments fall away. This paper presents the likely impact on poverty and food security in Ghana of differing degrees of climactic challenge. We consider three ranges of challenge: low, medium and high, where the low challenge corresponds to the IPCC shared socio-economic pathway, SSP1 ‘Sustainability’, medium to SSP2 ‘Middle of the Road’ and high to SSP3 ‘Fragmentation’. By examining this range of possible futures, we can provide a picture of the bounds of the impact on food security and poverty and highlight possible areas for policy intervention. We conduct the analysis using the Modular Applied GeNeral Equilibrium Tool (MAGNET), a GTAP-based global economic simulation model. The model is extended to include several Ghana-specific features including cocoa as a separate crop, Ghana’s main neighbouring and trading partners and most importantly, nine household types distinguished by location. The paper presents a SAM-based method for disaggregating the single representative household into multiple households types and integrates the households into the model using the MyGTAP approach. Capturing the heterogeneous effects on household groups in this way allows for a richer understanding of the impact on the three aspects of food security: availability, access and utilisation. In addition, we compute the standard Foster-Greer-Thorbeke poverty measures to indicate the change in poverty within each household group. The result is a Ghanaian-focused global CGE model that produces a detailed picture of the economy in 2030 and the degree to which climate change will threaten and potentially undo the development of the last two decades. We expect to find that the high climate challenge lowers GDP growth compared to the reference scenario; with negative effects for poverty and food security. The results provide a vision of the future for which policy interventions can be identified as part of Ghana’s mitigation and adaptation planning for the future. Furthermore, the results are likely to be of value not only to Ghana but also to surrounding countries with similar climates and economic structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Dijk, Michiel & Kuiper, Marijke & Shutes, Lindsay, 2014. "What does the future hold for the poor in Ghana? An assessment of the impact of climate change," Conference papers 332504, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332504/files/7024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bloom, David E & Williamson, Jeffrey G, 1998. "Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 12(3), pages 419-455, September.
    2. Bloom, David E. & Canning, David & Hu, Linlin & Liu, Yuanli & Mahal, Ajay & Yip, Winnie, 2010. "The contribution of population health and demographic change to economic growth in China and India," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 17-33, March.
    3. Yu, Miaojie, 2010. "Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 289-300, March.
    4. Anderson, James E, 1979. "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 106-116, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane Golley & Rod Tyers & Yixiao Zhou, 2018. "Fertility and savings contractions in China: Long‐run global implications," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 3194-3220, November.
    2. GOLLEY, Jane & WEI, Zheng, 2015. "Population dynamics and economic growth in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 15-32.
    3. Nadide Halıcı-Tülüce & İbrahim Doğan & Cüneyt Dumrul, 2016. "Is income relevant for health expenditure and economic growth nexus?," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 23-49, March.
    4. Rodolfo G. Campos & Benedikt Heid & Jacopo Timini, 2024. "The Economic Consequences of Geopolitical Fragmentation: Evidence from the Cold War," CESifo Working Paper Series 11057, CESifo.
    5. Francois, Joseph & Manchin, Miriam, 2013. "Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 165-175.
    6. Jane Golley & Rod Tyers & Yixiao Zhou, 2016. "Contractions in Chinese Fertility and Savings: Long-run Domestic and Global Implications," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Iris Day & John Simon (ed.),Structural Change in China: Implications for Australia and the World, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    7. Jain, Neha & Goli, Srinivas, 2021. "Potential demographic dividend for India, 2001 to 2061: A macro-simulation projection using the spectrum model," SocArXiv rvf9n, Center for Open Science.
    8. Wen-Yi Chen, 2017. "Demographic structure and monetary policy effectiveness: evidence from Taiwan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2521-2544, November.
    9. Adu, Raymond & Litsios, Ioannis & Baimbridge, Mark, 2022. "ECOWAS single currency: Prospective effects on trade," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Giray Gozgor & Chi Keung Marco Lau, 2017. "Institutions and gravity model: the role of political economy and corporate governance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(3), pages 421-436, December.
    11. Hao, Yu & Zhang, Zong-Yong & Yang, Chuxiao & Wu, Haitao, 2021. "Does structural labor change affect CO2 emissions? Theoretical and empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Lopreite, Milena & Zhu, Zhen, 2020. "The effects of ageing population on health expenditure and economic growth in China: A Bayesian-VAR approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Donatella Saccone, 2017. "Economic growth in emerging economies: what, who and why," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 800-803, June.
    14. Jain, Neha & Goli, Srinivas, 2021. "Demographic Change and Economic Growth in India," MPRA Paper 109560, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Estrella Gómez-Herrera, 2013. "Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1087-1111, June.
    16. Devi Setyorini & Budiono, 2020. "The Impact of Tariff and Imported Raw Materials on Textile and Clothing Export: Evidence from the United States Market," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 202004, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Jan 2020.
    17. Oxana Babecká Kucharčuková & Jan Babecký & Martin Raiser, 2012. "Gravity Approach for Modelling International Trade in South-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: The Role of Geography, Policy and Institutions," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 277-301, April.
    18. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2016. "New Zealand's trade with Asia and the role of good governance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-53.
    19. Laurent Didier, 2019. "Soft power and exporters behavior in international trade," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2595-2614.
    20. Donatella Saccone & Mario Deaglio, 2020. "Poverty, emergence, boom and affluence: a new classification of economies," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(1), pages 267-306, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.