IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331819.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taking Stock of the Doha Round Progress vis-à-vis Developing country's Ambitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Hammouda, Hakim
  • Karingi, Stephen N.
  • Oulmane, Nassim
  • Sadni Jallab, Mustapha

Abstract

There is consensus that unlike in the previous rounds of trade negotiations, the developing countries have in the current Doha Round enhanced their participation and voice. However, pessimism remains that when the results of the Doha Round are finally audited, they might not measure up to the early ambitions of the round. For Africa for instance, such a verdict would be quite disheartening given the resources that the countries have expended to ensure that this time round, real and credible results are achieved that will enhance the continent’s chance of moving out of the margins of the global trade to the centre. It is for this reason that an early audit of the possible results of the Doha Round becomes necessary. Such an audit will point out areas where potential results, based on analysis of current version of negotiations modalities may not match ambition in Doha mandate. This study provides a quantitative evaluation of the Doha Round in terms of the market access for industrial and agriculture products and the possible consequences of the trade liberalization process. It analysis of the impact of the reforms put forward by the July Package concluded in Geneva in July 2008. The tariff reduction scenarios under review fit in with the commitments undertaken in the July Package. and to present the potential economic implications of the unpacked modalities. This includes the review of the most recent works analyzing the Doha results using global general equilibrium models. Depending on the outcome of the review of recent works using global CGE models, further empirical analysis of the modalities (in agriculture, NAMA, services and trade facilitation) are proposed using the recent GTAP version 7 database. The main contribution will be the focus of the empirical analysis on the developing countries, taking advantage of the incorporation of more countries from the region in the new version of the database.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Hammouda, Hakim & Karingi, Stephen N. & Oulmane, Nassim & Sadni Jallab, Mustapha, 2009. "Taking Stock of the Doha Round Progress vis-à-vis Developing country's Ambitions," Conference papers 331819, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331819/files/4415.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.