IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331668.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recent Chilean Trade Policy facing Asia: Assessment of the FTAs with China and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Schuschny, Andrés R.
  • Durán Lima, José Elías
  • de Miguel, Carlos J.

Abstract

Chile has been at the forefront of trade liberalization in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC). After a first wave of agreements with his mayor partners in the Western Hemisphere and Europe, now Chile is focused on his partners in the Asian-Pacific Rim. Currently, there are Partial FTA negotiations with China and Japan. Using the GTAP CGE model and database, this paper assesses the effects of these two FTAs. The study takes into consideration all the previous FTA signed and currently in force in the country as well as most important recent trade agreements among the Latin American countries. Several scenarios for both FTAs are calibrated including the exclusion of sensitive products, unemployment possibilities and capital accumulation schemes. The results suggest that the FTAs will foster Chilean exports in both Japanese and China markets, especially in the case of light manufactures (meat, milk, and food products) and agricultural products (fruits and vegetables). Moreover, they will produce a positive shock fostering trade and diversifying export’s content of Chilean products to Japan/China – for example, the share of copper in total exports is reduced in more than 10% - as well as to other markets. Given that the Chilean trade pattern differs from other LAC of the Pacific Rim regarding Asia, trade deviation is negligible. The exclusion of sensitive products in the agreements reduces the positive outcomes for Chile. The results for Japan and China are quite tiny. However, it opens market access and investment opportunities toward LAC thought their Chilean partner and his regional web of FTAs. Welfare results are very positive for Chile, increasing nearly 0.7% of GDP while for his Asian partners welfare remains the same. The main conclusion points out a complementary trade relationship among these countries. The agreements also strengthen the Chilean GDP growth strategy based on trade liberalization, and make Chile a platform for business within LAC. On the other hand, Japan would recover its market share in LAC which has been decreasing over the lasts years, while China continues boosting its presence in the regional and Global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Schuschny, Andrés R. & Durán Lima, José Elías & de Miguel, Carlos J., 2007. "Recent Chilean Trade Policy facing Asia: Assessment of the FTAs with China and Japan," Conference papers 331668, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331668/files/3400.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Fugazza & David Vanzetti, 2008. "A South–South Survival Strategy: The Potential for Trade among Developing Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 663-684, May.
    2. Will Martin & Kym Anderson, 2006. "Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6889.
    3. Antoine Bouët & Simon Mevel & David Orden, 2007. "More or Less Ambition in the Doha Round: Winners and Losers from Trade Liberalisation with a Development Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 1253-1280, August.
    4. Marco Fugazza, 2004. "Export Performance And Its Determinants: Supply And Demand Constraints," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 26, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bosello, Francesco & Eboli, Fabio & Parrado, Ramiro & Rosa, Renato, 2010. "REDD in the Carbon Market: A general equilibrium analysis," Conference papers 331978, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Gouel, Christophe & Mitaritonna, Cristina & Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2011. "Sensitive products in the Doha negotiations: The case of European and Japanese market access," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2395-2403.
    3. Alessandro Nicita & Valentina Rollo, 2013. "Tariff Preferences As A Determinant For Exports From Sub-Saharan Africa," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 60, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    4. Bostan, Ionel & Grosu, Veronica, 2011. "General Equilibrium Dynamic Models and the Doha Round Impact on Underdeveloped Economies," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 159-174, March.
    5. Antoine Bouet, 2010. "Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha round," Larefi Working Papers 201001, Larefi, Université Bordeaux 4.
    6. Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David, 2017. "Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 6, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Métivier, Jeanne & Bacchetta, Marc & Bekkers, Eddy & Koopman, Robert, 2023. "International trade cooperation’s impact on the world economy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 713-744.
    8. McDonald, Scott. & Jansen, Marion. & Uexküll, Erik von., 2012. "The impact of crisis-related changes in trade flows on employment, incomes, regional and sectoral development in Brazil," ILO Working Papers 994689023402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Fugazza, Marco, 2007. "A new geography of preferences for Sub-Saharan African countries in a globalizing trading system," MPRA Paper 11575, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Métivier, Jeanne & Bacchetta, Marc & Bekkers, Eddy & Koopman, Robert Bernard, 2023. "International trade cooperation's impact on the world economy," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2023-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    11. Kristinn Hermannsson & Patrizio Lecca, 2016. "Human Capital in Economic Development: From Labour Productivity to Macroeconomic Impact," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 24-36, March.
    12. Eromenko, Igor, 2010. "Accession to the WTO. Computable General Equilibrium Analysis: the Case of Ukraine. Part I," MPRA Paper 67476, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sébastien Jean & David Laborde & Will Martin, 2008. "Choosing Sensitive Agricultural Products in Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 2008-18, CEPII research center.
    14. Kym Anderson, 2011. "Scope for world trade reform to ease Asian poverty and inequality," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia, chapter 11, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    15. Arne Melchior, 2006. "The Most and the Least Favoured Nations: Norway's Trade Policy in Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1329-1346, October.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    17. Laurent Didier, 2017. "South-South Trade and Geographical Diversification of Intra-SSA Trade: Evidence from BRICs," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 139-154, June.
    18. Kym Anderson & Anna Strutt, 2012. "Agriculture and Food Security in Asia by 2030," Macroeconomics Working Papers 23309, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    19. Christopher Hartwell, 2022. "Institutions and trade‐related inequality," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3246-3264, July.
    20. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2008. "The potential cost of a failed Doha Round," Issue briefs 56, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.