IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331208.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade Preferences for LDCs: A quantitative analysis of their utilization and suggestions to improve it

Author

Listed:
  • Inama, Stefano

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Inama, Stefano, 2004. "Trade Preferences for LDCs: A quantitative analysis of their utilization and suggestions to improve it," Conference papers 331208, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331208/files/1521.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry K. Goodwin, 1994. "Oligopsony Power: A Forgotten Dimension of Food Marketing? Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1163-1165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. C. Pasour, Jr., 2004. "Agricultural Economists and the State," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 1(1), pages 106-133, April.
    2. Laborde, David & Le Cacheux, Jacques, 2003. "Price and Welfare Effects of Agricultural Liberalization with Imperfect Competition in Food Industries and Trade," Conference papers 331155, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Aashish Argade & Arnab Kumar Laha & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2022. "Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1541-1554, September.
    4. Hervani, Aref A., 2005. "Can oligopsony power be measured? The case of U.S. old newspapers market," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 343-380.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.