IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr06/208030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment Of Bicycle Paths From Users Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalez, Liliana
  • Hanumara, Choudary
  • Overdeep, Carol
  • Church, Steven

Abstract

The Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) has been on the forefront in recognizing the potential for bicycle travel to provide mobility, reduce congestion, improve environmental quality, and promote healthy lifestyles. An important component of RIDOT’s mission has been to create a balanced transportation system that embraces a multi-modal approach to transportation decision-making and bicycling has remained central to the department’s inter-modal planning efforts. RIDOT has aggressively pursued a strategy of acquiring abandoned rail lines to convert into scenic commuter and recreational trails. RIDOT’s efforts have produced a very popular resource for touring, recreational, exercise, and commuting activities. As part of RIDOT’s continuing efforts to promote bicycle use as another form of transportation, planners in RIDOT’s Intermodal Planning Division identified the need to compile a comprehensive survey of bike path activity that would provide a gauge of demand and general attitudes. The construction of several new bikeways as part of RIDOT’s statewide bicycle plan have intensified the need for new and current data on path use, types of users, maintenance issues, and the positive economic potential of the state’s bikeways to local businesses. The survey results show that visitors to the bike paths came from all age groups and from all over the state. The paths are clearly facilities with wide appeal. In fact, 99.12% of respondents, answered “yes” when asked if bike path construction constituted good use of tax dollars. The results of the survey reveal enthusiastic support for the bikeways as a facility to promote a healthy lifestyle; unfortunately, use of the bike paths as an alternative facility for commuting remains near its low 1996 level. The lack of restroom facilities and drinking water were the two common complaints from visitors from all of the paths; there are safety concerns about intersections with motor vehicles. Overall, the survey has provided the Intermodal Planning Division a valuable source of information for improving, maintaining, and providing high quality facilities. The results of this survey presented in this paper in descriptive form are useful to planners responsible for developing, expanding and maintaining bike paths in other parts of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalez, Liliana & Hanumara, Choudary & Overdeep, Carol & Church, Steven, 2006. "Assessment Of Bicycle Paths From Users Perspective," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208030, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr06:208030
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208030/files/2006_6B_BicyclePaths_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr06:208030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.