Author
Listed:
- Manfredo, Mark R.
- Richards, Timothy J.
- McDermott, Scott
Abstract
While not ignoring risk, agricultural cooperatives tend to accommodate risk through the holding of internal capital reserves rather than engage in active risk management. A lack of information regarding the risk, returns, and the effect on cooperative financial performance of both traditional and innovative risk management strategies is likely a constraint to the adoption of active risk management by cooperatives. In this research, we examine the influence of alternative risk management strategies on cooperative financial performance, namely the return on assets (ROA) of grain merchandising cooperatives of various sizes. Strategies include traditional exchange traded futures and options strategies, an over-the-counter revenue swap, throughput insurance, and combinations of price and throughput strategies. Each of these strategies, for small, medium, and large size firms, are evaluated using a range of procedures including techniques which rely on mean-variance efficiency as well as evaluation procedures which help determine the ability of a strategy to mitigate downside risk. The results of the simulation exercise provide considerable support for the routine buying of at-the-money put options in setting a commodity floor price. The results also support the use, and perhaps the development, of insurance on cooperative throughput if the insurance product is used in conjunction with a price risk management strategy, in essence providing a hedge against downfalls in revenue. Over-the-counter revenue swaps, while intuitively appealing, did not perform well on average relative to more traditional exchange traded products. This result is especially important given the added counter party risk associated with such contracts. However, in some cases, the revenue swap, as well routine hedging with futures, performed better under a Value-at-Risk evaluation criteria than with a mean-variance criteria. Hence, it is important for cooperative managers to consider these results in the context of the risk management goals.
Suggested Citation
Manfredo, Mark R. & Richards, Timothy J. & McDermott, Scott, 2003.
"Risk Management Techniques For Agricultural Cooperatives: An Empirical Evaluation,"
2003 Conference, April 21-22, 2003, St. Louis, Missouri
18985, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ncrthr:18985
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18985
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005.
"The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis,"
Working Paper Series
3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
- Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005.
"The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis,"
Working Paper Series
18942, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
- repec:vuw:vuwscr:18942 is not listed on IDEAS
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncrthr:18985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauiuus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.