IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/midasp/11634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Issues And Alternatives In The 1995 Farm Bill Debate: Implications Of The Uruguay Round Of Gatt Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Batie, Sandra S.
  • Schweikhardt, David B.

Abstract

The recently completed round of negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade focused on domestic and international agricultural policies. If this agreement is approved by Congress, U.S. agricultural programs must comply with GATT provisions. The policy choices made during the 1995 farm bill debate about domestic programs, import policies, and export programs could all be affected by the approval of GATT.

Suggested Citation

  • Batie, Sandra S. & Schweikhardt, David B., 1994. "Issues And Alternatives In The 1995 Farm Bill Debate: Implications Of The Uruguay Round Of Gatt Negotiations," Staff Paper Series 11634, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11634
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.11634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/11634/files/23377.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.11634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.