IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/348972.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyse des rechtlichen Rahmens und von Förderprogrammen für die Neuanlage von Hecken

Author

Listed:
  • Schütze, Berit
  • Tönshoff, Charlotte
  • Wegmann, Johannes

Abstract

Hedgerows provide a variety of ecosystem services such as erosion control, improvement of the microclimate and wood production. They are an important habitat for plants and animals in the agricultural landscape. In addition, there is a new focus on the climate protection potential of hedges as carbon sequestration of hedgerows per hectare is comparable to estimates for forests. Thus, the political goal is to greatly expand hedgerow structures in Germany by 2030 as a measure for nature-based solutions. However, the increase of hedgerows has been low in recent years. To identify reasons, a literature analysis was carried out. The current legal framework and existing funding programmes for hedgerows were investigated. Based on this, factors that promote or hinder the planting of new hedgerows were identified. Legal regulations have to be considered when planting, managing and maintaining hedgerows. These can have an inhibiting effect. A major obstacle is the ban on the removal of hedgerows as usable agricultural land is permanently removed. Furthermore, the protection of hedgerows under the federal nature conservation law makes it difficult to utilise hedgerow products beyond the use of cuttings. Besides, the lack of availability of native woody plants and fear of sanctions due to the large number and associated complexity of legal regulations have to be considered as an inhibiting factor. Nearly every federal state in Germany offers area-based or investment-based funding measures that can support the development of hedgerows. They vary in terms of funding objective, funding amounts, territorial scope and funding recipients. Possible factors for low take-up are insufficient funding amounts, financial hurdles due to advance payments, a lack of clarity of funding programmes, a lack of targeting of landowners, low financial incentives for maintenance of hedgerows and bureaucratic funding procedures. Funding programmes with comparatively high fixed funding amounts are called up the most. To make the planting of hedges financially attractive, the reduction in land value has to be taken into account in funding programmes. There is a clear focus on nature conservation both in funding programmes and in law considering hedgerows. The climate protection potential of hedgerows has not yet been taken into account in funding programmes. With regard to climate protection, CO2-certificates could play an important role in the future as part of carbon farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Schütze, Berit & Tönshoff, Charlotte & Wegmann, Johannes, 2024. "Analyse des rechtlichen Rahmens und von Förderprogrammen für die Neuanlage von Hecken," Thünen Working Paper 348972, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:348972
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348972/files/dn068918.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Climate Change; Environmental Economics and Policy; Political Economy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:348972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.