IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/348971.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Humusberatung im Ackerbau – Bedeutung, Bewertung und Perspektiven

Author

Listed:
  • Wetterau, Rosalie Ina
  • Schroeder, Lilli Aline
  • Heidecke, Claudia
  • Maier, Martin
  • Egenolf, Konrad

Abstract

Humus – also known as soil organic matter – is of crucial importance for many soil functions and the formation of a good soil structure. The increase and preservation of humus can therefore contribute to climate protection and adaptation, which is becoming more important both politically and publicly. Regarding the implementation of humus-building agricultural practices, an existing knowledge deficit among farmers can represent a barrier that can be overcome through appropriate advice. Based on a final Master Thesis, the aim of this study was to evaluate the supply, demand and design of advice on the topic of humus formation. For this, a literature review was first carried out and an overview of existing humus advisory services in Germany was compiled. An online survey of 40 farmers from the HumusKlimaNetz model and demonstration project was carried out to determine the current use of interest in humus advice and important criteria for its design. The evaluation was mainly done descriptive, but also using statistical tests and qualitative content analysis. There was little discussion of humus formation and maintenance in vocational training and in general arable farming advice for the interviewed farmers, which illustrates their need for humus advice. A total of 43 % of the farmers surveyed have already taken advantage of humus advice, primarily in private advice and from clubs or associations. 90 % of those surveyed are interested in receiving humus advice in the future, preferably from associations and organizations, the official state advisory service and the chambers of agriculture. Funding opportunities lie on the one hand in public funding and on the other hand in the high willingness to pay by the farmers (65 % of the farmers surveyed). Methodologically, for the interviewed farmers, the focus should be on media, information events and the exchange of experiences with colleagues. Around 69 to 83 % of the farmers could also imagine taking advantage of an annual individual farm consultation (including soil tests and humus balancing). Based on the knowledge gained in this study, it is recommended to expand the individual farm planning of field-specific humus-building measures but to carry out further studies first and to check, if humus advice can be implemented as part of an integrated environment- and climate advisory approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Wetterau, Rosalie Ina & Schroeder, Lilli Aline & Heidecke, Claudia & Maier, Martin & Egenolf, Konrad, 2024. "Humusberatung im Ackerbau – Bedeutung, Bewertung und Perspektiven," Thünen Working Paper 348971, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:348971
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348971/files/dn069221.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Land Economics/Use;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:348971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.